ArticleBiomedical engineering online2025
An interpretable machine learning model integrating computed tomography radiomics and clinical features for predicting the urosepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe urosepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a critical health risk necessitating prompt medical identification and intervention. Nevertheless, a deficiency exists in the availability of a tool for precise and timely predictive analysis. The purpose is to establish a machine learning (ML) model using radiomic features and clinical data to predict urosepsis following PCNL.
methodThis study retrospectively included 401 patients with kidney stones from two centers who underwent PCNL. To enhance the dataset's equilibrium, the synthetic minority over-sampling technique for regression with Gaussian noise (SMOGN) was used to resample the training set. The screening of radiomics features and the construction of radiomics scores were completed by applying the Absolute Shrinkage Selection Operator (LASSO). Subsequently, the critical clinical indicators for urosepsis were pinpointed through the application of a multivariate logistic regression. The performance of seven ML algorithms was compared for the combined dataset that incorporated clinical variables and radiomics scores. The efficacy of these models was assessed through the implementation of a fivefold cross-validation process. Ultimately, the Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) methodology was utilized to provide a visual and interpretative analysis of the optimal model.
resultAmong 401 patients, 30 cases (7.48%) were diagnosed with urosepsis. The radiomics score, established by 13 radiomics features, was combined with six important clinical features (including urine nitrite positivity, stone volume, mean intrarenal pressures, urine white blood cells, and operation time) to construct a combined dataset. Comparative analysis of seven machine learning (ML) models revealed that CatBoost demonstrated superior predictive performance. The model achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) values of 0.88, 0.94, and 0.89 on the training, internal test, and external validation sets, respectively. Corresponding area under the precision-recall curve (AUC-PR) values were 0.92, 0.75, and 0.63. The SHAP value method identifies key features influencing prediction outcomes, with the radiomics score and urine nitrite positivity being the top contributors to the model. We deployed the optimal prediction model to a web for clinical application ( https://predictive-model-for-urosepsis.streamlit.app/ ).
conclusionThis study constructed a predictive model that incorporates clinical risk characteristics and radiomics scores to assess the risk of urosepsis after PCNL, with SHAP visualization for clinical physicians to formulate evaluation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.