ArticleThrombosis journal2025
Association between recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin administration dosages and mortality in patients with sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation.
Article in Thrombosis journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe optimal dosing strategy for recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (rhTM) in clinical practice for sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) has not been comprehensively evaluated. This study aimed to investigate whether different rhTM dosing strategies influence mortality outcomes in patients with sepsis-induced DIC.
methodsThis retrospective, single-center cohort study included hospitalized patients aged ≥ 18 years who were diagnosed with sepsis and received rhTM for DIC treatment between 2011 and 2024. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality across different rhTM dosing strategies (standard-dose or reduced-dose). The distribution of mortality between the two groups was compared using the log-rank test, and mortality estimates were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards analysis. To address confounding bias, we employed a double robust method that adjusted the model with covariates while accounting for inverse probability weighting of the treatment.
resultsA total of 167 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 84 patients were in the standard-dose group and 83 patients were in the reduced-dose group. The median rhTM dosage for the entire cohort was 328 U/kg/day, with estimated plasma trough concentrations of 1622 ng/mL and 835 ng/mL in the standard-dose and reduced-dose groups, respectively. The mortality rate was 30% in the standard-dose group and 42% in the reduced-dose group, showing significantly better outcomes (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.561; 95% confidence interval, 0.323-0.973; P = 0.039).
conclusionsThis study demonstrated that a kidney function-based dose reduction strategy for rhTM administration is associated with inferior mortality outcomes in patients with sepsis-induced DIC. Although our findings are limited by the retrospective nature of this study, they provide valuable insights for future verification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.