ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2025
Safe and respectful? Birth attendants' hand hygiene compliance and its determinants using nationally representative data from Kenya, Malawi and Nepal.
Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn low and middle-income countries (LMICs), infections acquired during childbirth contribute significantly to maternal and neonatal mortality. Hand hygiene (HH) is critical in preventing the spread of infections, yet compliance remains inadequate. This study investigates birth attendants' HH compliance during labour, delivery, and postpartum in LMICs, using nationally representative data from Service Provision Assessments (SPAs) in Kenya, Malawi, and Nepal.
methodsWe analysed 1565 observed deliveries across 517 health facilities, resulting in 3919 HH opportunities. The outcomes were hand washing or hand disinfectant use: (1) before any initial examination, (2) before aseptic procedures during labour, (3) after birth. We used descriptive statistics to assess HH compliance and multivariate multilevel mixed-effect logistic regressions to investigate determinants, accounting for facility and individual clustering.
findingsHand hygiene compliance varied significantly across countries, with Kenya showing the lowest rates, while Malawi and Nepal had higher compliance levels. Supportive and effective communication towards pregnant women was significantly associated with an increase in HH compliance before the vaginal examination (Kenya - OR: 5.94, 95% CI 1.68-21.0; Malawi - OR: 2.19, 95% CI 1.04-4.65) and before aseptic procedures (Kenya - OR: 4.03, 95% CI 1.81-8.96; Malawi - OR: 4.01, 95% CI 1.69-9.50; Nepal - OR: 2.66, 95% CI 1.30-5.44). HH compliance during aseptic procedures during labour was also associated with recent IPC training in Malawi (OR: 3.48,95%CI 1.44-8.41) and facility infrastructure (OR: 6.14,95%CI 1.07-35.3).
conclusionLow hand hygiene compliance during birth, especially before aseptic procedures, can lead to healthcare-associated infections with serious consequences for mothers and newborns. Future research should investigate further the association between effective communication and hand hygiene.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.