ArticleBMC health services research2025
From bureaucracy to bedside teamwork: maintaining patient safety in COVID-19 care - staff experiences of COVID-19 care in a Swedish university hospital.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to describe healthcare staff’s experiences of planning and providing care for patients with COVID-19 at a university hospital in western Sweden.
designA qualitative content analysis was conducted based on 28 semi-structured interviews with healthcare staff at a university hospital in western Sweden.
findingsOne overarching category was identified: Togetherness to Maintain Patient Safety, comprising three subcategories: Managing Uncertainty and Fear of an Unknown Disease, Coping with High Workloads in an Unfamiliar Work Environment, and Collaborating with unfamiliar staff members. These themes illustrate how staff navigated the challenges of planning and delivering care during the pandemic. ORIGINALITY: Despite severe challenges, including high patient acuity, limited evidence-based knowledge, and resource constraints, staff successfully implemented ongoing improvements through a shared commitment to patient safety. Organizational flexibility and the reduction of hierarchical routines alleviated burdens on healthcare professionals, fostering collaboration and a person-centred approach to care. RESEARCH IMPLICATIONS: Collaboration among staff emerged as a central feature, supported by reduced bureaucracy and the use of continuous improvement methods, such as the plan–do–study–act cycle. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The study highlights the challenges created by the rapid onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, which profoundly affected healthcare working conditions. Staff collaboration, reinforced by less bureaucratic structures, facilitated continuous improvement and strengthened the commitment to delivering safe care under uncertain and demanding circumstances. SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Working together, supported by effective organizational and managerial leadership, was essential for adapting practices and safeguarding patient safety when evidence-based guidelines were limited. Standardized group introductions, divided into general routines and unit-specific practices, were identified as critical for reducing workload pressures on both permanent and redeployed staff.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.