ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2025
Classification of Alzheimer's disease in a mixed clinical cohort using biofluid Raman spectroscopy.
Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is a critical unmet need for scalable, accessible and objective diagnostic tests for stratification in dementia. Biofluid Raman spectroscopy (RS) due to its simplicity, holistic and label-free nature, is a powerful approach that has the potential to offer differential diagnosis across dementia types including Alzheimer's disease (AD). RS is a laser-based optical method that can rapidly provide chemically rich information ('spectral biomarkers') from biofluids but its utility for AD diagnosis has not been established in a 'real-world' context, specifically from a clinically heterogenous cohort of patients. We carried out RS measurements on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples of patients from a mixed clinical cohort (N = 143). All patients reported cognitive complaints and were clinically diagnosed over 2 years with conditions including AD and other neurodegenerative diseases, as well as developmental and long-term chronic conditions. Machine-learning algorithms were trained, optimised and evaluated on Raman spectra to classify AD from non-AD. AD was classified with 93% accuracy for patients in the testing set. Time from sample to classification was < 1 h. Spectral biomarkers explaining AD classification were identified and primarily assigned to protein-derived aromatic amino acids, representing a difference in proteome signature between AD and non-AD groups. Signals from a subset of spectral biomarkers directly correlated with pathological CSF biomarker concentrations including amyloid-β 42, phosphorylated-tau 181, and total tau. This pre-clinical study is a first step towards realising the real-world application of RS for dementia diagnosis. Compared to current and emerging methods, RS does not require sophisticated instrumentation or specialised labs. It is reagentless and simple, offering unprecedented rapidity, scalability, accessibility for dementia diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.