ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2025
Is it worse than death? Appraisal of health states among older adults and their relatives in Switzerland.
Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveOur objective was to study health state appraisals in healthy older Swiss with a focus on health deficits typically associated with dementia. We also aimed to elucidate the congruency of self-ratings of health states with proxy-ratings by possible future surrogate decision-makers.
methodsThis is a single-center, cross-sectional survey among a convenience sample of pairs of healthy older adults and their possible future surrogate decision-makers. Following a States Worse Than Death (SWD) approach, participants were asked to appraise health deficit states in relation to death both for themselves and for their dyadic partners.
resultsThe final sample consisted of 248 participants, i.e. 124 pairs of healthy older adults (62.1% male; mean age: 71.6ys (SD: 10.5ys)) and their possible future surrogate decisionmakers (mostly spouses or children). Of the 17 health states included in the survey, eleven were rated as equal or worse than death by more than half of healthy older adults. Similarly, ten health states were rated as equal or worse than death by more than half of possible future surrogate decision-makers. Overall, there was good - and higher than random - congruency between ratings of dyadic partners. DISCUSSION: Participants of our study preferred death over living with various types of health impairments to a striking extent, particularly those associated with dementia. There was a good consistency of health state appraisals between dyadic partners which could translate into consistent decision-making - in case proxy decision-making were to become necessary. The use of patient-centered health measures such as SWD approaches may aid goals-of-care discussions, facilitate end-of-life communications and thus improve healthcare decision-making. Future research should investigate how SWD appraisals change over time and with deterioration of health and how they depend on societal acceptance of health impairments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.