ArticleJournal of medical case reports2025
Spontaneous non-laboring uterine rupture of an unscarred uterus in a 44-year-old female patient lacking predisposing factors: a case report.
Article in Journal of medical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUterine rupture during gestation is an uncommon but serious complication involving a complete tear in all layers of the uterine wall. The median occurrence rate of this condition is estimated to be 5.3 per 10,000 total births. This condition is strongly associated with scarred uterus, with approximately 90% of ruptures occurring in women who have had prior uterine surgery while spontaneous uterine rupture of unscarred uterus is exceedingly rare and is a considerably more severe complication, posing a clinical challenge to obstetricians and prompting immediate diagnosis and management to manage the massive hemorrhage. CASE PRESENTATION: A 44 year-old gravida 3, para 2 Syrian woman at 36 weeks of pregnancy presented with complaints of generalized fatigue and mild lower abdominal pain. The patient reported a sudden onset of severe abdominal pain approximately 2 hours prior to arrival, which resolved spontaneously. She had no significant medical history. On gynecological examination, the patient was not in labor and ultrasound examination demonstrated extramural fetus with a contracted and involuted uterus along with free intraperitoneal fluid, substantially corroborating the diagnosis of spontaneous uterine rupture in the absence of predisposing factors. Our patient underwent exploratory laparotomy, during which the deceased fetus and the placenta were removed from the peritoneal cavity, followed by total hysterectomy, and the follow-up course was uneventful.
conclusionSpontaneous non-laboring uterine rupture of unscarred uterus may unexpectedly occur even in the absence of predisposing factors. The clinical suspicion is key to avoid confusion with other differential diagnoses. Clinicians must remain vigilant about the atypical presentations of uterine rupture to avoid delayed diagnosis and management of uterine rupture. Ultrasound may substantially corroborate the preoperative diagnosis. Hysterectomy remains the preferred management in cases of severe uterine ruptures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.