ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2025
Multidimensional sleep health linked to quality of life among Chinese adults.
Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Nonpharmacological interventions to improve the sleep of informal caregivers of people with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Gerontologist · 2026Pooled it
- Multidimensional sleep health and its association with fatigue among patients undergoing hemodialysis in China.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDespite the well-documented prevalence of sleep problems in the general population and their associations with significant health consequences that compromise quality of life, comprehensive investigations of multidimensional sleep health in Hong Kong Chinese adults remain limited. This study aimed to characterize multidimensional sleep health in Chinese adults and evaluate its association with health-related quality of life (HRQL).
methodsData were collected through a cross-sectional study of a population-representative sample in the Hong Kong community. The Short-Form-12 Health Survey version 2 (SF-12v2), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Nonrestorative Sleep Scale (NRSS), Patient Health Questionnaire, Perceived Stress Scale, and ENRICHD Social Support Instrument were administered. Objective sleep parameters were derived from ActiGraph Link accelerometer data. The composite sleep health score was computed by aggregating the scores of efficiency, regularity, duration, and timing by actigraphy measures and the subjectively reported satisfaction and alertness by the PSQI and NRSS. Group comparison and multiple linear regression were performed to examine the association between sleep health and HRQL.
resultsA total of 500 adults (66.4% female, 39.1 years old on average) completed the survey. Participants scored 51.56 (46.57, 55.09), 49.69 (43.07, 56.72), and 2.67 ± 1.36 on the physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) of the SF-12v2 and the sleep health composite score, respectively. Individuals with better sleep regularity and sleep health composite scores had higher MCS. After adjusting for sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics, somatic symptoms, stress, and social support, sleep regularity demonstrated a statistically significant association with MCS (B = 1.38, P = 0.038), while the composite score of sleep health was significantly associated with role physical of PCS (B = 0.46, P = 0.041).
conclusionsSleep regularity and a composite score of sleep health were associated with HRQL in Chinese adults, suggesting that targeted interventions to enhance overall sleep health and specific dimensions may yield measurable improvements in population HRQL outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.