ArticleBMC surgery2025
Invasion prediction with artificial intelligence in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients: a proof-of-concept study.
Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI-assisted digital breast tomosynthesis as a decision-support tool for post-neoadjuvant surgical planning in breast cancer.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDuctal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a heterogeneous precursor lesion with variable invasive potential. Current predictive parameters for invasion risk offer limited utility for personalized assessment. This study aims to evaluate artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted mammography analysis as a tool for predicting invasion risk in DCIS patients.
methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, 74 patients with pathologically proven DCIS by preoperative biopsy were analyzed using a deep learning-based AI system (Transpara version 1.7.4). The AI system classified patients into low-risk and high-risk groups, which were validated against postoperative histopathological findings. Statistical analysis included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy calculations.
resultsInvasion was detected in 19 (25.7%) patients, with 18 (94.7%) classified as high-risk by the AI system. The model demonstrated 94.7% sensitivity, 45.5% specificity, 37.5% PPV, and 96.2% NPV. In patients aged ≥ 50 years and those with lesions ≥ 3 cm, the NPV reached 100%. A significant relationship was found between necrosis and invasion (p = 0.004).
conclusionsThe high NPV suggests AI-assisted mammography analysis could serve as an effective rule-out tool for invasion in DCIS patients, potentially identifying candidates for less aggressive surgical treatment. Further validation in larger, multi-center studies is necessary to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.