Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41121152›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2025

Q&A: inbreeding and its implications for conservation.

Bárbara R Parreira, Patrícia Pečnerová, Laura Tensen, Sabhrina Gita Aninta, Anna Brüniche-Olsen, Anubhab Khan, Hernán E Morales, Lauren M Hennelly

Abstract readInterview
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bárbara R ParreiraGlobe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. barbara.parreira@sund.ku.dk.
Patrícia PečnerováDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Laura TensenDepartment of Biology, Section Ecology and Evolution, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sabhrina Gita AnintaDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anna Brüniche-OlsenCenter for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anubhab KhanCenter for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India.
Hernán E MoralesGlobe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lauren M HennellyGlobe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

European Research Council 101078303European Union's Horizon 2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 101063039FORMAS 2023-01441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inbreeding depression plays a role in the decline, endangerment, and extinction of small populations, and thus inbreeding has received much attention in conservation biology. The term inbreeding is used across distinct fields but sometimes with varying meanings. This inconsistency creates misunderstandings that complicate interpretation, hinder comparisons among studies, and obstruct effective communication of findings. In this piece, we clarify the conceptual foundations of inbreeding, showcase modern estimates, and discuss its significance and relation to classical definitions. When used together, these interpretations can offer a more comprehensive understanding of the genetic dynamics in small populations.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesInbreedingAnimals

Identifiers

PMID41121152
PMCPMC12538986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.