ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
Differences in swallowing efficacy of disease modifying treatment between infants receiving pre-symptomatic and symptomatic administration.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSpinal muscular atrophy causes progressive motor neuron degeneration that impedes an infant's ability to maintain full oral nutrition and manage secretions. Development of pharmaceuticals that halt neuromuscular degeneration have enabled survival and improvement in motor function, with infants who receive treatment before symptoms exhibiting better outcomes than those who receive treatment after symptom onset. Little is known about the impact of treatment timing on swallowing. We retrospectively evaluated swallowing biomechanics and function among infants who received a disease modifying treatment and a swallow study as part of routine clinical care at 13 international children's hospitals. Swallow studies were prospectively analyzed for measures of biomechanics using BabyVFSSImP© and Swallowtail, with chart reviews used to evaluate measures of function including oral intake status and secretion management. Data was reported with descriptive statistics, with differences in swallowing outcomes compared between infants who received pre-symptomatic and symptomatic treatment using non-parametric t-tests.
results69 infants meeting eligibility criteria were included. The majority received treatment after symptom onset (N = 52, 75%) and had two copies of survival motor neuron 2 (SMN2) (pre-symptomatic N = 17, 100%; symptomatic N = 48, 92%). Median age of infants at the time of their last videofluoroscopic swallow study was 7.92 months (IQR 4.83). While profound impairments in swallowing biomechanics were rare among infants who received pre-symptomatic treatment, they were common among infants treated after symptom onset, with significantly worse (higher) scores in four BabyVFSSImP© domains (ts > 3.25, ps ≤ 0.01, δ > 0.42): Palatal-Pharyngeal Approximation, Airway Invasion/Laryngeal Closure, Aspiration, and Pharyngeal Transport and Clearance. Although all pre-symptomatic treated infants were managing secretions without suctioning and nearly all were consuming full age-appropriate nutrition (N = 15, 88%), similar to biomechanics, select pre-symptomatic treated infants did exhibit profound functional impairments.
conclusionsInfants who receive pre-symptomatic treatment for spinal muscular atrophy typically have good swallowing outcomes, without profound impairments in biomechanics, reliance on suctioning for secretion management, and reliance on alternative nutrition care. Pharyngeal biomechanical deficits are substantially more common among those infants that receive treatment after symptom onset, and likely are associated with subclinical neural degradation at the time treatment is administered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.