ArticleBMC oral health2025
Microscopic characterization of level 3 surgical masks in a simulation model of dental care: a preliminary study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study evaluated the morphology of level 3 surgical masks before and after aerosols' passage using a simulation model of dental care with human breathing system to evaluate the aerosol filtering efficacy, as close as possible to the reality of a dental clinical setting.
methodsEight groups of level 3 surgical masks were selected. The model used for analysis consisted of a human head prototype, a respirator system (artificial trachea, pneumatic plunger, and spirometry syringe), and a dummy head with artificial dental arch. Masks were exposed to 5 min of aerosol generation and the number of specimens with aerosol passage and total areas of aerosol pigmentation were evaluated. The microscopic analysis of masks using optical microscopy, helium ion microscopy and scanning electron microscope were performed before and after aerosols' passage.
resultsAll groups presented aerosols passage (55-88%). The areas of aerosol passage revealed differences between groups (p < 0.05). In microscopy analysis, the inner and outer layers of masks showed a spunbond processing technique; the middle layer differed among groups of masks showing spunbond or meltblown processes, confirming what was reported by manufactures.
conclusionThe inner and outer layers of masks are morphologically similar, different to the middle layer. All level 3 surgical masks presented high levels of aerosols passage. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study highlights the need for more effective surgical masks in dental care settings. Understanding the morphological differences between mask layers can inform improvements in mask design for better protection for healthcare professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.