Observational studyBMC oral health2025
Clinical and radiographic outcomes of entire papilla preservation versus open flap debridement using bovine-derived xenograft and leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin in the treatment of isolated intrabony defects.
Observational study in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06687785 (A Comparison of the Clinical and Radiographic Results of the Entire Papilla Preservation), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Comparison of the Clinical and Radiographic Results of the Entire Papilla Preservation (EPP) Technique and Conventional Flap Surgery (CFS) Technique in the Treatment of Isolated Intrabony Defects at 6 Months
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative evaluation of open flap debridement with or without injectable platelet-rich fibrin in chronic periodontitis treatment.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Comparative assessment of injectable platelet-rich fibrin versus concentrated growth factor for periodontal intrabony defects.Bioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to compare the short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Entire Papilla Preservation (EPP) technique versus Open Flap Debridement (OFD) in the treatment of isolated intrabony periodontal defects, with both approaches performed using bovine-derived xenograft and a leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) membrane. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 28 patients diagnosed with Stage 3 Grade B periodontitis, who underwent either EPP (n = 14) or OFD (n = 14) using bovine-derived xenograft and L-PRF following initial non-surgical periodontal therapy. Clinical parameters-including clinical attachment level (CAL) and probing depth (PD)-were recorded as primary outcomes at baseline and 6 months postoperatively. Early wound healing index (EHI), and patient-reported pain using a visual analogue scale (VAS) were considered secondary outcomes and were assessed within the first postoperative week. Standardized periapical radiographs were used to evaluate defect resolution. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test, paired sample t-test, and chi-square test, with the significance level set at p < 0.05.
resultsBoth groups showed significant CAL gain postoperatively. The EPP group demonstrated a higher mean CAL gain (4.64 ± 1.10 mm) compared to the OFD group (3.43 ± 1.32 mm). A statistically significant difference in the distribution of CAL gain categories between the groups was observed (p = 0.006). PD reduction was observed in both groups with no significant difference (p = 0.62). REC increased significantly in the OFD group (p < 0.05), whereas changes in the EPP group were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). EPP resulted in significantly lower postoperative VAS scores and higher EHI scores (p < 0.001), indicating better patient comfort and faster early healing.
conclusionThe EPP technique resulted in greater CAL gain and reduced postoperative discomfort than OFD when both were performed with bovine-derived xenograft and L-PRF. These findings suggest that EPP may serve as a minimally invasive and effective alternative for managing isolated intrabony defects, particularly when preservation of the interdental papilla is desired. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The EPP technique, designed to preserve the interdental papilla and support primary closure, may be considered a minimally invasive alternative to OFD in suitable cases of isolated intrabony defects.
trial registrationTrial registration is also available at ClinicalTrials.gov. Clinical Trials-ID: NCT06687785 Registration Date: 07.11.2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.