Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41121124›Full record

Observational studyBMC oral health2025

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of entire papilla preservation versus open flap debridement using bovine-derived xenograft and leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin in the treatment of isolated intrabony defects.

Fatma Uçan Yarkaç, Kaan Yıldız, Muhammed Emin Kalender, Ömer Öğütcen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06687785 (A Comparison of the Clinical and Radiographic Results of the Entire Papilla Preservation), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06687785 active not recruitingnot on this map

A Comparison of the Clinical and Radiographic Results of the Entire Papilla Preservation (EPP) Technique and Conventional Flap Surgery (CFS) Technique in the Treatment of Isolated Intrabony Defects at 6 Months

TypeobservationalSponsorNecmettin Erbakan UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled28ConditionsPeriodontal Intrabony DefectArmsEntire Papilla Preservation Technique, Conventional Flap Surgery Technique
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fatma Uçan YarkaçDepartment of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, 42050, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8126-585X
Kaan YıldızDepartment of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, 42050, Turkey. kaan.yildiz37@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-2614-4891
Muhammed Emin KalenderDepartment of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, 42050, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-6651-8053
Ömer ÖğütcenDepartment of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, 42050, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-7346-5516

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to compare the short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Entire Papilla Preservation (EPP) technique versus Open Flap Debridement (OFD) in the treatment of isolated intrabony periodontal defects, with both approaches performed using bovine-derived xenograft and a leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) membrane. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study included 28 patients diagnosed with Stage 3 Grade B periodontitis, who underwent either EPP (n = 14) or OFD (n = 14) using bovine-derived xenograft and L-PRF following initial non-surgical periodontal therapy. Clinical parameters-including clinical attachment level (CAL) and probing depth (PD)-were recorded as primary outcomes at baseline and 6 months postoperatively. Early wound healing index (EHI), and patient-reported pain using a visual analogue scale (VAS) were considered secondary outcomes and were assessed within the first postoperative week. Standardized periapical radiographs were used to evaluate defect resolution. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test, paired sample t-test, and chi-square test, with the significance level set at p < 0.05.

resultsBoth groups showed significant CAL gain postoperatively. The EPP group demonstrated a higher mean CAL gain (4.64 ± 1.10 mm) compared to the OFD group (3.43 ± 1.32 mm). A statistically significant difference in the distribution of CAL gain categories between the groups was observed (p = 0.006). PD reduction was observed in both groups with no significant difference (p = 0.62). REC increased significantly in the OFD group (p < 0.05), whereas changes in the EPP group were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). EPP resulted in significantly lower postoperative VAS scores and higher EHI scores (p < 0.001), indicating better patient comfort and faster early healing.

conclusionThe EPP technique resulted in greater CAL gain and reduced postoperative discomfort than OFD when both were performed with bovine-derived xenograft and L-PRF. These findings suggest that EPP may serve as a minimally invasive and effective alternative for managing isolated intrabony defects, particularly when preservation of the interdental papilla is desired. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The EPP technique, designed to preserve the interdental papilla and support primary closure, may be considered a minimally invasive alternative to OFD in suitable cases of isolated intrabony defects.

trial registrationTrial registration is also available at ClinicalTrials.gov. Clinical Trials-ID: NCT06687785 Registration Date: 07.11.2024.

Indexed as

Alveolar Bone LossDebridementDental PapillaPeriodontal DebridementPlatelet-Rich FibrinSurgical FlapsAdultAgedAnimalsCattleFemaleHeterograftsHumansLeukocytesMaleMiddle AgedAlveolar bone lossGingival papillaPeriodontitisSurgical flapsWound healing

Identifiers

PMID41121124
PMCPMC12539118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.