Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41121121›Full record

ArticleChiropractic & manual therapies2025

Patient safety culture research within the chiropractic profession: a scoping review.

Debbie S Wright, Maranda Kleppe, Brian C Coleman, Martha Funabashi, Amy G Ferguson, Richard Brown, Sidney M Rubinstein, Stacie A Salsbury, Katherine A Pohlman

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Debbie S WrightParker University, 2540 Walnut Hill Ln, Dallas, TX, 75229, USA.
Maranda KleppePalmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, IA, USA.
Brian C ColemanYale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Martha FunabashiCanadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Amy G FergusonEvidence Search Lab, Richardson, TX, USA.
Richard BrownRichard Brown Chiropractic Consultancy, London, UK.
Sidney M RubinsteinVrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Stacie A SalsburyPalmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, IA, USA.
Katherine A PohlmanParker University, 2540 Walnut Hill Ln, Dallas, TX, 75229, USA. kpohlman@parker.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA proactive patient safety culture is crucial in healthcare to minimize preventable harm and improve patient outcomes. This scoping review explores key themes, trends, and gaps in patient safety culture research within the chiropractic profession.

methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted across 5 databases from inception to December 2024. Peer-reviewed, English-language studies focusing on chiropractic patient safety culture were included. Following scoping review methodology, articles were screened, data were extracted, and both qualitative and quantitative analyses were conducted. External consultants from patient safety-focused chiropractic groups were sought to review findings. Trends and themes were identified, and findings were compared against established patient safety frameworks to highlight research gaps and future directions.

resultsOf the 3,039 screened articles, 65 met the inclusion criteria, spanning from 1990 to 2024, with 2 identified as randomized trials. Eight major themes were organized: (1) adverse event research, (2) clinical trial safety reporting, (3) patient safety attitudes, (4) clinical decision making, (5) informed consent, (6) reporting and learning systems, (7) office sanitization, and (8) general safety topics. Mapping these studies onto the Patient Safety Culture Pyramid framework revealed that 95% addressed safety performance, 81% covered safety processes, and only 23% explored beliefs and values. Comparisons with the WHO Global Patient Safety Action Plan framework highlighted advancements in clinical process safety while revealing research gaps in patient engagement, policy development, leadership, and interprofessional collaboration. Key recommendations include standardizing adverse event reporting, improving communication strategies, and developing structured approaches to patient and provider safety. External consultation provided minimal feedback requiring modifications.

conclusionThis review underscores significant advancements and gaps in chiropractic patient safety culture research, particularly in leadership, policy, and interprofessional engagement. Future research should focus on implementing and evaluating evidence-based safety interventions to enhance transparency, improve patient outcomes, and build public trust in chiropractic care. Direct stakeholder engagement, including with patients, is necessary to determine the most effective strategies for integrating patient safety within the global chiropractic profession.

Indexed as

ChiropracticPatient SafetyHumansOrganizational CultureAdverse eventChiropracticPatient harmPatient safetyRisk managementSafety managementSpinal manipulation

Identifiers

PMID41121121
PMCPMC12538883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.