Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41121114›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2025

Routine endoscopy prior to bariatric surgery: evidence-based necessity or institutional tradition?

Serhat Doğan, Burhan Hakan Kanat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Serhat DoğanDepartment of General Surgery, Private Kayseri Acıbadem Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey. drserhatdogan@gmail.com.
Burhan Hakan KanatDepartment of General Surgery, Turgut Özal University, Medicine School, Malatya, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity, a growing global health challenge, requires effective treatment modalities, among which bariatric surgery is the gold standard for patients with Class III obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m² or ≥ 35 kg/m² with comorbidities). While surgical outcomes are well established, the role of routine preoperative Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) remains debated. This study evaluates the role of EGD in preoperative planning among a Turkish cohort. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 117 patients who underwent Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) or Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) between 2018 and 2021. Data on demographics, comorbidities, endoscopic and histopathologic findings, and surgical modifications were collected. Preoperative EGD revealed pathology in 86.3% of patients, including antral gastritis (64.1%), hiatal hernia (22.2%), and erosive esophagitis (18.8%). Chronic gastritis was confirmed histopathologically in 74.4%, and active Helicobacter pylori infection was identified in 15.4% of surgical specimens. Notably, EGD findings led to changes in surgical management in 18.8% of cases.Our findings support the utility of routine EGD in bariatric surgery, emphasizing its role in identifying otherwise undetected pathologies that influence surgical decision-making. Further multicenter prospective studies are warranted.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryEndoscopy, Digestive SystemObesity, MorbidPreoperative CareAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGastrectomyGastric BypassGastritisHelicobacter InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTurkeyBariatric surgeryHelicobacter pyloriHiatal herniaObesityPreoperative EsophagogastroduodenoscopySurgical planning

Identifiers

PMID41121114
PMCPMC12542399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.