ArticleBMC health services research2025
Accessibility, clarity, and organizational opportunities to enhance interprofessional collaboration in alcohol interventions: A qualitative study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patients' Perceptions of the Role of Nursing in Substance Use Disorder Treatment Programs: Qualitative Study.JMIR nursing · 2026Article
- Findings from the Process Evaluation of a Mobile Health Clinic Designed to Improve Equity of Access to Primary Healthcare for People with Substance Use Disorders and/or Homelessness in One Region in the North East of England, UK.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe implementation of effective interventions targeting problematic drinking in healthcare and social care remains limited, leading to fewer people changing their problematic drinking patterns. Improving interprofessional collaboration could enhance implementation of interventions targeting problematic drinking, yet a comprehensive understanding of interprofessional collaboration in the Netherlands regarding these interventions is currently lacking. This study set out to identify perceptions and experiences with interprofessional collaboration and the implementation of interventions targeting problematic drinking among professionals working in healthcare, social care and public sectors in a region of the Netherlands where problematic drinking is a known challenge.
methodsGuided by a phenomenological perspective, we conducted a cross-sectional interview study with 22 professionals. Semi-structured interviews were recorded and transcripts were analysed for themes using Atlas.ti.
resultsParticipants described their roles in interprofessional collaboration as minimalists (i.e., working strictly task oriented), brokers, or skilled networkers depending on their function and their perception of task and role fulfilment as a professional. Accessibility, clear role definitions, and leadership were identified as key to initiating and maintaining interprofessional collaboration. Challenges in interprofessional collaboration included regional, financial, or professional boundaries. Additionally, participants who were insiders of regional collaboration structures found these structures beneficial to interprofessional collaboration, while outsiders perceived them to be an impediment to collaboration and information exchange.
conclusionsInterprofessional collaboration structures seem to enhance collaboration among professionals, and, as a result, enhance the implementation of interventions targeting problematic drinking. Management of healthcare, social care, or public sector organizations should recognize that outsider-organizations may have limited access to these structures. They should therefore appoint network-oriented professionals to act as brokers, linking external organizations to enhance collaboration and information exchange. Additionally, organizations should provide flexible scheduling for their professionals so that they can concentrate on tasks beyond their immediate responsibilities, which will contribute to interprofessional collaboration and early detection of problematic drinking. Lastly, further research on intervention implementation should focus on expertise-development within teams to improve interprofessional collaboration, and consider how the perspectives of populations at risk for problematic drinking can be incorporated into collaboration-structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.