Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41121102›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Accessibility, clarity, and organizational opportunities to enhance interprofessional collaboration in alcohol interventions: A qualitative study.

Ruud T J Roodbeen, Jeroen Bruinsma, Andrea D Rozema, Rik Crutzen, Sarah E Stutterheim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ruud T J RoodbeenDepartment of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands. ruud.roodbeen@iriszorg.nl.
Jeroen BruinsmaDepartment of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Andrea D RozemaDepartment Tranzo, Academic Collaborative Centre Addiction, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Rik CrutzenDepartment of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Sarah E StutterheimDepartment of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw 555002034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe implementation of effective interventions targeting problematic drinking in healthcare and social care remains limited, leading to fewer people changing their problematic drinking patterns. Improving interprofessional collaboration could enhance implementation of interventions targeting problematic drinking, yet a comprehensive understanding of interprofessional collaboration in the Netherlands regarding these interventions is currently lacking. This study set out to identify perceptions and experiences with interprofessional collaboration and the implementation of interventions targeting problematic drinking among professionals working in healthcare, social care and public sectors in a region of the Netherlands where problematic drinking is a known challenge.

methodsGuided by a phenomenological perspective, we conducted a cross-sectional interview study with 22 professionals. Semi-structured interviews were recorded and transcripts were analysed for themes using Atlas.ti.

resultsParticipants described their roles in interprofessional collaboration as minimalists (i.e., working strictly task oriented), brokers, or skilled networkers depending on their function and their perception of task and role fulfilment as a professional. Accessibility, clear role definitions, and leadership were identified as key to initiating and maintaining interprofessional collaboration. Challenges in interprofessional collaboration included regional, financial, or professional boundaries. Additionally, participants who were insiders of regional collaboration structures found these structures beneficial to interprofessional collaboration, while outsiders perceived them to be an impediment to collaboration and information exchange.

conclusionsInterprofessional collaboration structures seem to enhance collaboration among professionals, and, as a result, enhance the implementation of interventions targeting problematic drinking. Management of healthcare, social care, or public sector organizations should recognize that outsider-organizations may have limited access to these structures. They should therefore appoint network-oriented professionals to act as brokers, linking external organizations to enhance collaboration and information exchange. Additionally, organizations should provide flexible scheduling for their professionals so that they can concentrate on tasks beyond their immediate responsibilities, which will contribute to interprofessional collaboration and early detection of problematic drinking. Lastly, further research on intervention implementation should focus on expertise-development within teams to improve interprofessional collaboration, and consider how the perspectives of populations at risk for problematic drinking can be incorporated into collaboration-structures.

Indexed as

AlcoholismCooperative BehaviorHealth Services AccessibilityInterprofessional RelationsAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsQualitative ResearchHealthcare providersInterprofessional collaborationProblematic drinkingSemi-structured interviewsSocial workersThematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID41121102
PMCPMC12541934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.