ArticleBMC medical education2025
Evaluation of the effectiveness of the medical faculty curriculum in the acquisition of a "one health" approach.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn this study, it was aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the medical school curriculum in the acquisition of the concept of one health by first and sixth year students of a medical school.
methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted by Çukurova University Departments of Public Health and Medical Education and Informatics with 309 first-year students and 315 sixth-year students studying at the Faculty of Medicine in the summer of 2024 and autumn of 2025. Students were reached using the convenience sampling method. The questionnaire consisted of items assessing whether students were familiar with the One Health concept, their definition of the concept, sources of information, issues related to the One Health approach (antimicrobial resistance, zoonotic diseases, vector-borne diseases, foodborne diseases, environmental problems, laboratory-related issues, and other problems), as well as factors that might influence awareness of the concept (such as having a family member working in human health, animal health, or environmental/food safety). In addition, the Global Climate Change Awareness Scale was included. The impact of the medical school curriculum on the One Health approach was also evaluated.
resultsThe mean age of the students included in our study was 21.3 ± 3.44 years. Thirty per cent of the students stated that they had information about the concept of One Health. 16.5% of the students stated medical education as a source in the acquisition of the concept of One Health. It was found that the rate of those who defined the One Health approach correctly was higher in 6th grade students and the relationship between the grade level and the correct definition of the One Health approach was weak (Cramer's V = 0.195). It was found that the rate of those who stated that they had knowledge in the dimensions of zoonotic diseases, vector-borne diseases, food-borne diseases, environmental problems was higher in sixth grade students, and there was no significant difference in the sub-dimensions of antimicrobial resistance and laboratory problems. When the effect of medical school education attributed to One Health and its sub-dimensions is analysed, it is 8.1 per 100 people for general One Health concept knowledge. The topics with the lowest attributed effectiveness were antimicrobial resistance (AE = 2.8) and laboratory problems (AE = 2.7), and the topics with the highest attributed effectiveness were vector-borne diseases (AE = 11.4) and zoonotic diseases (AE = 8.8).
conclusionIn our study, it was concluded that the medical faculty curriculum is not sufficient for the acquisition of the concept of one health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.