ReviewBMC ophthalmology2025
Internal carotid artery dissection manifesting as paracentral acute middle maculopathy: a case report and review of literature.
Review in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundParacentral acute middle maculopathy (PAMM), which is a microvasculopathy characterized by ischemic injury to the middle retinal layers, typically presents with acute-onset paracentral scotomas, PAMM is often monocular, and may lead to permanent visual field defects. CASE PRESENTATION: In this case report, we present a patient with acute paracentral acute middle maculopathy (PAMM) due to internal carotid artery dissection (ICAD), without any other systemic symptoms. A 37-year-old male presented with acute visual impairment in his left eye. Cerebral angiography confirmed ICAD. His visual acuity and function significantly improved following internal carotid artery angioplasty and thrombectomy.
conclusionsThis case underscores the need for ophthalmologists to maintain heightened awareness of potential carotid pathology in patients presenting with PAMM. Concurrently, neurologists should closely monitor retinal perfusion status in patients with ICAD. Multidisciplinary collaboration and precision medicine strategies are pivotal for optimizing patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.