Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41121062›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Integrating genetics into medical curriculum: evaluating a dedicated clinical genetics module at Dow university of health sciences.

Misbah Iqbal Hanif, Muhammad Furqan Bari, Mushtaq Hussain, Naheed Khan, Nazli Hossain, Muhammad Saeed Quraishy, Salman Kirmani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Misbah Iqbal HanifDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan. misbah.hanif@duhs.edu.pk.
Muhammad Furqan BariDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Mushtaq HussainDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Naheed KhanDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Nazli HossainDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Muhammad Saeed QuraishyDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Salman KirmaniAgha Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvances in clinical genetics have significantly impacted modern healthcare, making genetic knowledge essential for today's medical professionals. It is crucial for general physicians to recognize when genetic or genomic testing is appropriate for guiding treatment decisions. In response to this need, Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS) has initiated a two-week dedicated clinical genetics module for 4th-year medical students, to enhance the curriculum with more focused approach. This comprehensive module covers basic genetics, inheritance principles, molecular genetics, genetic epidemiology, and the clinical application of genetic knowledge. It also addresses the social, legal, and ethical implications of genetic information, preparing students for patient communication and genetic counseling. This article discusses the importance of teaching clinical genetics to medical students, presents survey findings, examination results, and underscores the significance of including genetic education in medical curricula to enhance clinical utility and patient care.

methodsThe genetic module was constructed to equip students with skills for personalized medicine and online tutorials for navigating genomic databases. Upon completion, students from both Dow Medical College (DMC) and Dow International Medical College (DIMC) completed a survey. Examination results and the student's responses of the survey were analyzed using SPSS version 23.

resultsAmong the 125 surveyed students, 72% were from the DMC and 28% were from the DIMC, with a median age of 22 years and predominantly male (79.2%). Approximately 59% had previous exposure to genetics. The module received positive feedback: 58.4% rated it excellent, and 37.6% rated it good. Content clarity and lecture engagement were highly rated, with over 90% finding them clear and engaging. According to 90.4% of the respondents, learning objectives were well met. The inclusion of more genetic content in the MBBS curriculum was considered important by 87.2%. Medical genetics was deemed highly relevant to future practice by 93.6%. The module significantly enhanced understanding of patient care, with strong overall student satisfaction. In the Genetic Module Exam, DMC students had a pass rate of 95.69%, while DIMC students had a pass rate of 79.62%. Overall, 91.46% of students passed the exam.

conclusionThe clinical genetics module at DUHS was well received, effectively enhancing students' understanding of genetic principles and their clinical applications. Students highly rated the module for content clarity, lecture engagement, and relevance to future medical practice. There is a strong demand for more genetic education in the MBBS curriculum, highlighting its importance in preparing future healthcare professionals.

Indexed as

CurriculumEducation, Medical, UndergraduateGenetics, MedicalClinical CompetenceCommunicationFemaleGenetic CounselingHumansMaleMolecular BiologyMolecular EpidemiologyPrecision MedicineSchools, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41121062
PMCPMC12542173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.