Trial reportBMC oral health2025
Efficacy of an oral hygiene intervention on a geriatric ward: from sample size calculation to dropout-driven disillusionment - a randomised controlled study.
Trial report in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOlder home-dwelling adults with care needs often demonstrate deficient oral hygiene due to cognitive and motor impairments, as evidenced by increased plaque levels, which can compromise oral and general health. Concurrently, dental care utilisation declines with age. Hospitalisation may represent a critical opportunity to address this gap. However, dental assessments are not routinely integrated into multiprofessional inpatient geriatric care. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an oral hygiene education intervention on the plaque index compared with standard of care (SoC) among older frail acutely ill hospitalised inpatients.
methodsIn this randomised controlled trial (RCT), hospitalised older inpatients were allocated to an intervention or control group. The intervention group participated in a structured oral hygiene education program including theoretical instruction on oral health and practical assistance in developing a personalised oral hygiene routine during their hospital stay. The control group received standard of care (SoC) on ward without additional oral hygiene support. Dental assessments were conducted at baseline (BL), pre-discharge (FU-1), and three months post-discharge (FU-2). Data on geriatric syndromes, comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and the CGA-based Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI) were collected. The oral hygiene intervention and all assessments were conducted by the study dentist.
resultsAmong 36 participants (mean age 79.6 ± 8.1 years), 16 participants of the intervention group (n = 19) achieved a significant reduction in plaque index according to Silness Loe (PI; range 0-3) between BL (mean 2.4 ± 0.5) and FU-1, with an average improvement of 0.5 points (p < 0.001, d = 1.2), while controls (n = 17) showed no improvements (p > 0.05; d = - 0.1). Higher oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) scores were linked to better outcomes, while immobility resulted in reduced improvement in oral hygiene. Follow-up at FU-2 was limited by health-related attrition, with only four participants completing the study.
conclusionsHospital-based diagnostics revealed widespread oral health problems of dependent home-dwelling individuals. The intervention improved oral hygiene in this high-risk group during hospitalisation. Integrating oral health diagnostics and interventions into geriatric care plans could address this critical aspect of patient health.
trial registrationThe study is registered at German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00027438; date of registration: February 13, 2023).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.