ArticleBMC health services research2025
Measuring growth in research capacity and capability of allied health professionals at a regional Australian public health service: 2011-2023.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Valuing Place in Rural Health Education and Research: The Contribution of University Departments of Rural Health.The Australian journal of rural health · 2026Article
- Building Research Capacity and Culture in Allied Health - A Five-Year Strategic Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Development and evaluation of a tool (named Evidence Brief) to communicate allied health research translation.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionClinicians within public healthcare organisations, including allied health professionals are becoming increasingly research active. Townsville Hospital and Health Service (THHS) employed an embedded Research Fellow in 2010 to build the capacity and capability under a state-wide initiative resulting in increased activity over time. A Research Capability Framework (RCF) was introduced in 2018 with intent of having a briefer measure of activity than the previously used research 'spider'. This study measures and explores the growth in research capacity and capability over 12 years.
methodsA mixed methods triangulation design compared two ways of measuring research capacity including interviews and self-rating of the RCF objectives by Discipline Directors (DD), and a survey of allied health professionals to measure their level of research experience and knowledge of health services research methods. The interviews were themed and quantitative data was analysed descriptively.
results12 DDs, 5 Team Leaders and 105 clinicians participated. Four major themes were identified from the interviews: clinical practice provides a rich environment for quality improvement and research activity, influence of health service managers on research culture, prioritising clinical care over research, and the effect of collaborations on research. High levels of research participation were noted, and varying levels of methods knowledge were evident. DISCUSSION: Similar results in consuming and producing research activity by both instruments suggest the shorter RCF could replace the more onerous research spider. Qualitative data collected simultaneously with the Objective ratings can be used to plan the future direction of capacity building efforts. The high levels of experience in quality improvement skills but limited knowledge of research translation methods suggest this knowledge gap may be a barrier to the translation of allied health research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.