Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41121003›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Exploring pediatric residents' readiness for point-of-care ultrasound in two teaching hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: insights into training, confidence, and practice.

Robel Sintayehu, Tigist Worku, Yohannes Feleke, Melaku Moges

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robel SintayehuDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care, Emergency and Critical Care PGY-III Chief Resident, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Tigist WorkuDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care, Emergency and Critical Care Consultant, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. tglemma2007@gmail.com.
Yohannes FelekeDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care, Emergency and Critical Care Consultant, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. yohannesfeleke91@gmail.com.
Melaku MogesDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, Pediatrics PGY-3 Chief Resident, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa , Ethiopia. melakumoges81@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoint-of-care ultrasound is an evolving field in medical education and emergency practice. Numerous pieces of evidence support the use of point-of-care ultrasound in children to improve outcomes. Pediatrics as a specialty has been relatively late to adopt point-of-care ultrasound, with a significant gap in specific recommendations and implementation. Assessing pediatric residents’ perception and knowledge is one of the crucial factors for successfully integrating point-of-care ultrasound into pediatric emergency and critical care practice. The objective of the study is to describe pediatric residents’ perception toward pediatric point-of-care ultrasound practice and identify factors associated with knowledge of point-of-care ultrasound.

methodA cross-sectional study assessed the perception and knowledge of 97 pediatric residents from Year 1 to Year 3 in two tertiary hospitals in Addis Ababa. An online questionnaire was used to collect data on demographics, perception, and knowledge toward point-of-care ultrasound. The data was entered and analyzed using SPSS version 26 software, employing analytic and descriptive parameters. Binary and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with point-of-care ultrasound knowledge.

resultA majority (70.1%) of residents have a good understanding of the potential use of point-of-care ultrasound for pediatrics. A majority (67%) of residents rated point-of-care ultrasound as a valuable tool for improving diagnostic accuracy with a Good perception. Regarding the importance of integrating point-of-care ultrasound training into pediatric residency programs, 70.1% of residents have a positive perception. The most significant perceived barrier to point-of-care ultrasound practice is a lack of training (72.2%). Residents with any form of point-of-care ultrasound training were significantly more likely to score above the median knowledge assessment (AOR = 58.46; 95% CI: 5.835-585.858; P-value = 0.01). Residents who reported using point-of-care ultrasound once a month or once a week were significantly more likely to have good knowledge of point-of-care ultrasound compared to those who never or rarely used it (AOR = 9.000; 95% CI: 2.307–35.118; P-value = 0.020 and AOR = 7.661; 95% CI: 1.375–42.695; P-value = 0.039), respectively. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Our findings reflect a positive self-perception among pediatric residents toward integrating POCUS into residency training. This integration is likely to increase acceptance among pediatric residents. Our results highlight the importance of prior training and regular use of point-of-care ultrasound in enhancing the knowledge of pediatric residents. We recommend that further studies be conducted to assess the impact of educational interventions on the pre- and post-knowledge of pediatric residents toward point-of-care ultrasound. Another area of interest for future research would be the factors hindering the integration of point-of-care ultrasound into pediatric curricula.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceInternship and ResidencyPediatricsPoint-of-Care SystemsAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHospitals, TeachingHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUltrasonographyAddis ababaPediatrics and child healthPoint of care ultrasoundResidents

Identifiers

PMID41121003
PMCPMC12538734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.