SynthesisBMC anesthesiology2025
Corticosteroids for sepsis and septic shock: a meta-analysis of 18 RCTs with dose-stratified and fludrocortisone subgroup evaluation.
Synthesis in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Refractory septic shock: our updated pragmatic approach.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe therapeutic benefit of corticosteroids in managing sepsis and septic shock remains controversial, particularly concerning optimal dosing strategies and the role of adjunctive fludrocortisone. Recent large-scale trials and updated guidelines underscore the need for a dose-stratified synthesis. This meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the effects of corticosteroids on short-term mortality in sepsis, with subgroup analyses by steroid type, dosage, and geographic region.
methodsThis study followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing corticosteroids with placebo in adult patients with sepsis or septic shock were included. Subgroup analyses were pre-specified for daily hydrocortisone-equivalent dose (≤ 200 mg, 201-300 mg, > 300 mg), steroid type (hydrocortisone alone vs. hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone), and region (China vs. non-China). Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were synthesized using a random-effects model.
resultsEighteen RCTs comprising 7,982 patients were included. Corticosteroid therapy was associated with reduced 28-day mortality (RR = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.79-0.98; I² = 39%). The 28-day mortality was 31.0% in the corticosteroid group versus 35.5% in the control group.The most pronounced benefit was seen with 201-300 mg/day regimens (RR = 0.86; I² = 0%) and with combination therapy including fludrocortisone (RR = 0.89). Regional analysis showed weaker effects in trials conducted in China.
conclusionModerate-dose corticosteroids, especially when used in conjunction with fludrocortisone, significantly reduce short-term mortality in septic shock. Findings support guideline-endorsed steroid use and highlight the importance of individualized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.