ArticleBMC public health2025
Obstacles and facilitators of return to work among people with persistent pain who receive benefit payments: an in-depth interview study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPersistent pain is a major cause of work disability and early retirement, posing considerable challenges to welfare systems. The process of returning to work is complex and multifaceted, often becoming more difficult as the duration of absence increases. Most research on facilitators and obstacles for returning to work has focused on individuals on sick leave; less is known about those who are unemployed and receiving benefit payments. The aim in this study was to explore the obstacles and facilitators faced by participants with persistent pain, who are attempting to return to work while receiving benefit payments.
methodsIn this descriptive qualitative study, we used purposive sampling from a cohort study on the impact of being unemployed due to persistent pain. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using a topic guide, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the Framework method.
resultsWe interviewed 29 participants, of whom 12 had partly or fully returned to work, while 17 had not. Themes emerged around participants' experiences of obstacles and facilitators: (1) Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration, (2) healthcare, (3) psychological, (4) pain, and (5) perceptions of work. For facilitators, additional themes of 'luck' and 'disability pension' emerged.
conclusionWhile struggling with pain and coexisting health issues, participants experienced overwhelming system and contextual obstacles. Key facilitators included fortuitous encounters with supportive welfare system staff and personal attributes such as psychological flexibility and determination. Our findings highlight areas of the welfare system that could be improved to provide more empathetic and person-centred pathways for people with persistent pain wanting to return to work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.