Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41120964›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025

Clinical impact of intraocular lens tilt and decentration: a cross-sectional study.

Gonzalo Velarde-Rodriguez, Luis Garcia-Onrubia, Azahara Sánchez-Lozano, Lourdes Salgueiro-Tielas, Laura Moreno-Rodríguez, Miguel Faria-Ribeiro, Nicolás Alejandre-Alba

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gonzalo Velarde-RodriguezOphthalmology Department, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, C/ Avenida Reyes Católicos, 2. C.P, Madrid, 28040, España. gonzalo.velarde@quironsalud.es.
Luis Garcia-OnrubiaOphthalmology Department, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, C/ Avenida Reyes Católicos, 2. C.P, Madrid, 28040, España.
Azahara Sánchez-LozanoOphthalmology Department, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, C/ Avenida Reyes Católicos, 2. C.P, Madrid, 28040, España.
Lourdes Salgueiro-TielasOphthalmology Department, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, C/ Avenida Reyes Católicos, 2. C.P, Madrid, 28040, España.
Laura Moreno-RodríguezOphthalmology Department, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, C/ Avenida Reyes Católicos, 2. C.P, Madrid, 28040, España.
Miguel Faria-RibeiroPhysics Center of Minho and Porto Universities, School of Sciences, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Nicolás Alejandre-AlbaOphthalmology Department, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, C/ Avenida Reyes Católicos, 2. C.P, Madrid, 28040, España.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the impact of intraocular lens (IOL) tilt and decentration on visual performance within a clinical setting. Additionally, to explore the correlation between the capsulorhexis characteristics and IOL tilt and decentration.

methodsThis is a prospective study where patients who underwent uneventful cataract surgery and implanted with IOL Clareon CNA0T0 were evaluated with at least three months of follow-up. Best distance corrected visual acuity (BDCVA) and distance corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA) were evaluated. Also, an anterior swept-source optical coherence tomography (OCT) was used to measure the IOL centration and tilt. The capsulorhexis characteristics were described by the area, perimeter, main semi-axes and roundness.

resultsA total of 246 eyes from 123 patients, 52 males and 71 females, were included in this study. The mean age was 73.75 ± 8.27 years old. The mean tilt was 5.31 ± 1.42 degrees and mean value of decentration was 0.27 ± 0.16 mm. Monocular BDCVA and DCIVA were 0 ± 0.05 and 0.37 ± 0.12 LogMAR respectively. The mean capsulorhexis area was 25.36 ± 6.42 mm

conclusionsThe tilt and decentration measured for this IOL in this single-arm study were consistent with previously reported ranges, but no direct comparisons were performed. BCDVA and DCIVA are low correlated with those parameters and similarly, the shape and regularity of the capsulorhexis have no significant correlation with the tilt and decentration.

Indexed as

Artificial Lens Implant MigrationLenses, IntraocularLens Implantation, IntraocularVisual AcuityAgedAged, 80 and overCapsulorhexisCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesPseudophakiaTomography, Optical CoherenceCapsulorhexisCataract surgeryDescentrationIntraocular lensesTilt

Identifiers

PMID41120964
PMCPMC12538962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.