Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41120954›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025

Modified suture-assisted penetrating canaloplasty vs. compound trabeculectomy in treating primary angle-closure glaucoma.

Jianhui Zhang, Ningning Lin, Liu Zhang, Shancheng Si

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jianhui Zhang *School of Clinical Medicine, Eye institute and Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center of Xiamen University, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361004, China.
Ningning Lin *Department of Glaucoma, Fuzhou Eye Hospital, Fuzhou, 350007, China.
Liu ZhangSchool of Clinical Medicine, Eye institute and Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center of Xiamen University, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361004, China.
Shancheng SiBeijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital Eye Center, Beijing Visual Science and Translational Eye Research Institute (BERI), Tsinghua Medicine, Tsinghua University, 168 Litang Road, Changping District, Beijing, 102218, P.R. China. sishancheng@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-9159-7972

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposesTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a modified suture-assisted penetrating canaloplasty (SAPC) compared to compound trabeculectomy for treating primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG).

designRetrospective comparative interventional study.

methodsWe analyzed consecutive cases of uncontrolled PACG treated at Fuzhou Eye Hospital (December 2019-April 2021) with either modified SAPC (study group) or compound trabeculectomy (control group). Postoperative evaluations occurred at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Outcome measures included mean diurnal intraocular pressure (mdIOP), anti-glaucoma medication burden, surgical success rate (complete: mdIOP ≤18 mmHg without medications; qualified: mdIOP ≤18 mmHg with medications), and complications.

resultsThe final analysis included 19 eyes in the modified SAPC group and 17 eyes in the control group. At the 12-month follow-up, the SAPC group demonstrated a significant reduction in mdIOP from 20.17±6.00 mmHg to 12.38±2.60 mmHg (P<0.001), with medications reduced from 3.21±1.03 to 0.11±0.32 (P<0.001). Compared to the control group's mdIOP of 16.82±2.36 mmHg with 0.43±0.68 medications at 12 months, the modified SAPC group maintained significantly better pressure control (P<0.001). The complete success rate was substantially higher in the SAPC group (89.47% vs. 52.94%, P=0.038). Transient IOP elevation occurred in 5 eyes (26.3%) following SAPC, representing the most frequent postoperative complication. No significant vision loss or serious adverse events were observed.

conclusionModified SAPC provides effective and sustained IOP reduction with a favorable safety profile, outperforming compound trabeculectomy in PACG patients over 12 months. while minimizing medication dependence, demonstrating superior effectiveness to compound trabeculectomy with a favorable short-term safety profile. Why carry out this study? 1. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a modified suture-assisted penetrating canaloplasty (SAPC) technique compared to compound trabeculectomy in treating primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG). 2. This study addressed the limitations of high-cost microcatheters and bleb-related complications. What was learned from the study? 1. Modified SAPC demonstrated superior intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction (12.38±2.60 mmHg vs. 16.82±2.36 mmHg at 12 months) and higher complete success rates (89.47% vs. 52.94%) compared to compound trabeculectomy, with fewer complications and reduced dependence on postoperative medications. 2. The technique's cost-effective use of 5-0 polypropylene sutures and adjustable sutures simplified the procedure while maintaining high catheterization success (87.5%), offering a viable alternative for mild-to-moderate PACG. 3. Younger patients with short axial lengths showed an increased risk of malignant glaucoma post-SAPC, highlighting the need for refined surgical approaches in this subgroup.

Indexed as

Glaucoma, Angle-ClosureSuture TechniquesTrabeculectomyAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVisual AcuityCanaloplastyCompound trabeculectomyPrimary angle-closure glaucomaSuture-assisted penetrating canaloplasty

Identifiers

PMID41120954
PMCPMC12542471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.