Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41120952›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025

Persistent pain and brain fog after COVID-19 infection in European adults aged 50 and over: a population-based longitudinal study.

Xiaona He, Wei Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiaona HeSchool of Public Health, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Jiangxi, China.
Wei GaoSchool of Public Health, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Jiangxi, China. wei.gao@ncu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychological distress has been identified as a risk factor for long COVID in individuals infected with COVID-19. Little is known about the differences in long COVID symptom profiles between older adults with pre-existing depression and those without.

methodsA population-based longitudinal prospective study was performed using the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) with participants aged 50 years and older. Depression was assessed by the EURO-D scale at the baseline. Long COVID symptoms were self-reported by participants during the 12-month follow-up. A hurdle negative binomial model was employed to assess the impact of pre-existing depression on the burden of long COVID. We compared the differences in symptoms between participants with pre-existing depression and those without with the Chi-squared test.

resultsParticipants with pre-existing depression had an approximately 16% increased risk of experiencing additional persistent symptoms after COVID-19 infection. During the 12-month follow-up following COVID-19 infection, the prevalence of headaches (32.2% vs. 25.9%; P = 0.027), body aches or joint pain (38.5% vs. 29.4%; P < 0.001), and confusion (10.6% vs. 7.6%; P < 0.01) were significantly higher among participants with pre-existing depression than among those without.

conclusionOlder adults with pre-existing depression had a higher burden of long COVID following COVID-19 infection and they were more likely to suffer from persistent physical pain and confusion compared to those without a history of depression.

Indexed as

COVID-19DepressionPainAgedAged, 80 and overEuropeFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2Brain fogDepressionOlder adultsPost-COVID-19 condition

Identifiers

PMID41120952
PMCPMC12538725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.