Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41120944›Full record

Trial reportBMC infectious diseases2025

Daily single-strength vs. thrice-weekly double-strength trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for Pneumocystis jirovecii prophylaxis in kidney transplant recipients: a non-inferiority randomized control trial.

Wittawin Chantapoh, Surasak Kantachuvesiri, Napun Sutharattanapong, Jackrapong Bruminhent

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wittawin ChantapohDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Surasak KantachuvesiriDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Napun SutharattanapongDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jackrapong BruminhentRamathibodi Excellence Center for Organ Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. jackrapong.brm@mahidol.ac.th.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0930-8936

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is a significant concern in kidney transplant (KT) recipients, with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) as the recommended prophylaxis. However, direct comparisons between daily single-strength (DSS) and thrice-weekly double-strength (TDS) regimens remain limited. This study evaluated the efficacy of DSS versus TDS TMP/SMX for PJP prevention within the first six months post-transplant, along with side effects, renal outcomes, and patient-reported ease of drug consumption.

methodsWe conducted a pilot, single-center, open-label, block-randomized (1:1) non-inferiority trial at Ramathibodi Hospital between December 2022 and December 2023. Adult KT recipients were randomized to receive either TMP/SMX 80/400 mg daily (DSS group) or two SS tablets thrice weekly (TDS group). Patients were followed for six months to assess PJP occurrence, adverse effects, and ease of drug administration.

resultsSixty-five KT recipients were enrolled (DSS: 32, TDS: 33), with a median (IQR) age of 46 (15); 58% were male, 80% received deceased donor kidneys, 17% received anti-thymocyte globulin induction, and 95% were CMV-seropositive. No cases of PJP occurred in either group. The DSS group had a non-significant trend toward lower median (IQR) of white blood cell counts compared to the TDS group [6,235 (3,064) vs.7,052 (3,324) cells/mm3, p = 0.23], with no significant differences in hepatotoxicity or renal dysfunction. Drug convenience was reported in 96% of DSS and 100% of TDS recipients (p = 0.60).

conclusionBoth DSS and TDS TMP/SMX regimens showed comparable safety; however, non-inferiority could not be confirmed due to the absence of PJP in the early post-transplant period. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate the use of TDS as an alternative prophylactic strategy. (TCTR20220720010, 20 July 2022).

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisKidney TransplantationPneumocystis cariniiPneumonia, PneumocystisTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug CombinationAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsTransplant RecipientsAnti-Bacterial AgentsTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug CombinationKidney transplantPneumocystis jirovecii pneumoniaTrimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole

Identifiers

PMID41120944
PMCPMC12541958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.