Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2025
Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus rhomboid intercostal sub-serratus plane block for postoperative analgesia in open radical nephrectomy: a randomized clinical study.
Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05822011 (Ultrasound Guided Rhomboid Intercostal Subserratus Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block in Open Nephrectomy. Randomized Controlled Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Ultrasound Guided Rhomboid Intercostal Subserratus Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block in Open Nephrectomy. Randomized Controlled Study
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOpen radical nephrectomy often results in significant acute postoperative pain. Regional anesthesia offers an alternative analgesic approach in these situations. This study aims to assess and compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided rhomboid intercostal sub-serratus (RISS) block with Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) in patients undergoing open radical nephrectomy.
methodsThis randomized clinical trial included 42 patients scheduled for open radical nephrectomy (RN). Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the ESPB Group (n = 21), which received an ESPB with 30 ml of bupivacaine 0.25%, or the RISS Group (n = 21), which received a RISS block with 30 ml bupivacaine 0.25%. Total morphine consumption was set as the primary outcome while pain scores, perioperative hemodynamics and time to postoperative analgesia were considered as secondary outcomes.
resultsTotal morphine consumption within the first 24 postoperative hours was significantly lower for the ESPB group (16.4 ± 2.5 mg) compared to the RISS group (18.2 ± 1.8 mg), p = 0.011. VAS pain scores at rest were significantly lower in the ESPB group at 12 and 18 h (p = 0.002, p = 0.018) respectively. VAS scores with movement were significantly lower for the ESPB group at 8 h,12 h, and 18 h (p = 0.011, p = 0.001, and p = 0.018 respectively). The first time to receive postoperative analgesia was significantly longer in the ESPB group (7.3 ± 2.1 h) than in the RISS group (6.0 ± 2.1 h), p = 0.048. Both groups were comparable in the number of PCA boluses, the number of patients requiring intraoperative fentanyl increments, or recovery time.
conclusionUltrasound-guided ESPB provides slightly superior postoperative analgesia compared with RISS block in patients undergoing open radical nephrectomy via subcostal anterior incision for renal malignancies.
trial registrationThe trial was registered at Clinical Trials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05822011 , trial ID (NCT05822011, 14 March 2023).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.