ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Prediction of ectopic pregnancy using interpretable machine learning algorithms.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Predictive Value of Systemic Inflammatory Markers from Failed Single-Dose Methotrexate Therapy in Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEctopic Pregnancy (EP) is a type of pregnancy where the developing blastocyst implants in a location other than the endometrial cavity. The aim of study was developing predictive models that could improve the accuracy of identifying individuals at risk and uncover relationships between known risk factors and ectopic pregnancy occurrence.
methodsFive-fold cross-validation were employed to prevent overfitting and the Grid Search method was utilized to determine the optimal hyper-parameters for the models. The performance of the models was evaluated using metrics such as accuracy, Area Under the Curve (AUC), and Negative Predictive Value (NPV). The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used to interpret the model's decision-making process and identify the most significant features.
resultsRF demonstrated the best performance (87.13% accuracy, 90.65% AUC). Key predictors identified via logistic regression (LR) and SHAP analysis included mid-cycle pain, genital surgery history and dysmenorrhea.
conclusionThis investigation illustrates the potential for machine learning models to improve clinical decision-making and optimize patient outcomes in cases of ectopic pregnancy. Further validation in diverse populations is required due to the constraints of single-center data and the absence of critical risk factors, such as the use of PIDs and IUDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.