ArticleBMC genomics2025
Characterization of archaeal promoters using explainable and web-based CNN model.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundArchaea, the third realm of life, shows unique genetic and metabolic adaptations that enable its survival in harsh environments. Despite its biotechnological and evolutionary importance, limited research has been done on archaeal promoter prediction compared to bacteria and eukaryotes. Current tools have shortcomings such as relying solely on DNA duplex stability feature encoding, high false-positive rates, low precision and lack of publicly accessible archaeal promoter prediction tool.
resultsTo overcome these limitations, we present “iProm-Archaea”, a CNN-based tool for precise archaeal promoter prediction. Our method systematically assesses different feature encoding schemes and finds K-mer (K = 6) as the best representation to capture promoter motifs. For model training, we utilized experimentally validated archaeal promoters from Sulfolobus solfataricus, Haloferax volcanii, and Thermococcus kodakarensis. And T. Kodakarensis KOD1 for independent testing. To enhance interpretability, we incorporated explainable artificial intelligence and performed shapley additive explanations to uncover the most influential motifs contributing to the model’s predictions. iProm-Archaea achieves 92% accuracy on training data and 89% on an independent test dataset, outperforming state-of-the-art models. Cross-organism analysis reveals limited generalizability to prokaryotic and eukaryotic promoters, underscoring the distinct regulatory architecture of archaea. To facilitate practical use, we have developed a user-friendly webserver. Moreover, we leverage iProm-Archaea and annotate 5,86,455 archaeal promoters from 478 unannotated archaea genomes.
conclusionsThis work advances archaeal genomics by offering a robust, domain-specific tool for archaeal promoter detection. The development of a user-friendly webserver enhances practical accessibility for researchers. Our work not only improves prediction performance but also enhances the understanding of archaeal gene regulation to facilitate future biotechnological and evolutionary studies in this underexplored domain of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.