Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41120841›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2025

Adult trauma centers in Poland: where do we stand?

Tomasz Sanak, Jakub Nożewski, Mateusz Putowski, Aleksandra Załustowicz, Adam Burakowski, Klimek Józefowicz, Sylweriusz Kosiński

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tomasz SanakFaculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland. tomasz.sanak@uj.edu.pl.
Jakub NożewskiEmergency Department, Jan Biziel University Hospital no 2, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Mateusz PutowskiJan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.
Aleksandra ZałustowiczMountain Medicine Laboratory, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland.
Adam BurakowskiPolish Medical Air Rescue, Warsaw, Poland.
Klimek JózefowiczMedical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Sylweriusz KosińskiMountain Medicine Laboratory, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA trauma system based on trauma centers was established in Poland only at the beginning of the second decade of the century. The aim of this study was to quantitatively and comparatively assess the functioning of the trauma system in Poland during the postpandemic period, with a particular emphasis on adult trauma center (TC) performance indicators.

methodsSince there is no national registry of multiple trauma in Poland, the analysis is based on official public-use datasets. Among the indicators related to trauma centers, the following are available: number of EMT missions to trauma patients, number of trauma patients admitted to EDs, number of patients admitted to TCs, mode of admission (decision of EMT leader or trauma team leader), average length of stay, maximum length of stay, and number of deaths in the TC. Data for the years 2021-2023 from all 16 provinces were obtained. Missing and imprecise data were verified through interviews with the leaders of the individual TCs. Additionally, a review of the literature regarding treatment outcomes in Polish trauma centers was conducted.

resultsAn average of 1,029,615 trauma patients are admitted to EDs each year. The average number of admissions per year to TCs is 4645, i.e., 273 per center, with large regional variations ranging from 21 to 1226 admissions. Only 57% of patients are referred to TCs directly, on the basis of the decision of the EMT leader. The median length of stay is 11-12 days and is relatively constant over the period studied. The overall mortality rate in TCs is estimated at 6%, with wide variation from 0 to 31% across centers. The analysis may be biased with an error resulting from the poor quality of the data obtained.

conclusionsThe quality of care for patients with multiple organ injuries in Poland varies greatly across regions. There is a high risk of undertriage, largely due to the very stringent admission criteria for trauma centers. This results in a significant disparity in the number of patients admitted, even though the criteria are the same for all centers. The overall number of adult patients admitted to the TC appears to be low considering the overall trauma burden. The current criteria for triage and admission to a trauma center may be misinterpreted, leading to ineffective cooperation between the links of the trauma system. A nationwide trauma registry as a starting database of information for conducting epidemiological studies and developing treatment protocols is urgently needed.

Indexed as

Multiple traumaTransportation of patientsTrauma centersTriage

Identifiers

PMID41120841
PMCPMC12538963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.