SynthesisJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Antithrombotic Monotherapy or Combination Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation in Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
Synthesis in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oral anticoagulant monotherapy versus oral anticoagulant plus antiplatelet therapy in adults with stable coronary artery disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Definition of Polypharmacy in Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter: A Scoping Review.Cardiology research · 2026Review
- Clopidogrel vs. Aspirin in Double Antithrombotic Therapy for Patients on Oral Anticoagulation Undergoing Coronary Stenting.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Dabigatran outperforms warfarin in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease: reduced risks of bleeding and cardiovascular events.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease, guidelines recommend oral anticoagulation monotherapy after periods on dual antithrombotic therapy. These recommendations are based on evidence from prematurely terminated randomized controlled trials that were underpowered for bleeding and mortality end points. New data are available, so we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to pool the totality of randomized evidence.
methodsThis investigation was preregistered on International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024590457). Systematic searches and data extraction were performed independently and in duplicate for randomized controlled trials enrolling patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease that reported clinical end points. The prespecified coprimary end points were major bleeding and all-cause death. Prespecified secondary outcomes included all bleeding, cardiovascular death, noncardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, the composite of net adverse cardiovascular events and coronary revascularization. End point data were pooled using fixed and random effect models, to generate hazard ratios (HR) and relative risks and corresponding 95% CIs.
resultsFour randomized controlled trials enrolling 4092 patients were eligible, with 2049 randomized to monotherapy and 2043 randomized to dual therapy. Monotherapy reduced the hazard of major bleeding by 41% (HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.44-0.79],
conclusionsIn patients with stable coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation, oral anticoagulation monotherapy reduces major bleeding compared with dual antithrombotic therapy. There were no significant differences in all-cause and cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, adverse cardiovascular events, and coronary revascularization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.