ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2025
Automated bone age calculation is an independent predictor of vertebral fracture burden in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of intermittent corticosteroids on scoliosis, bone density, and vertebral fractures in duchenne muscular dystrophy.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Article
- Risk factors for abnormal bone mineral density in Duchenne muscular dystrophy and the association of regular rehabilitation with bone health.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone age (BA) assessments by BoneXpert were similar to BA evaluations by experienced radiologists in males with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Furthermore, BA delay as determined by both radiologists and BoneXpert, and the BoneXpert-derived Bone Health Index Z-score (a surrogate for bone strength), were associated with spinal fragility. PURPOSE: To compare BA assessed by experienced radiologists versus BoneXpert in males with DMD and to evaluate the extent to which BA delay, and the BoneXpert-derived Bone Health Index (BHI, a proposed surrogate for bone strength), are associated with the Spinal Deformity Index (a measure of vertebral fracture [VF] burden).
methodsResults were compared for BA evaluated on 54 left-hand radiographs from patients with DMD (chronological age [CA] 11.6 ± 3.8 years; mean ± SD) by experienced radiologists versus BoneXpert. The relationships between BA delay (CA-BA), BHI, and the SDI were assessed.
resultsThe mean BA delays reported by radiologists (-1.9 ± 2.4 years) and BoneXpert (-1.8 ± 2.4 years) were similar (p = 0.138) with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.978 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.961-0.987). Multivariable Poisson regression showed that every 1-year BA delay by BoneXpert was associated with a 1.5-fold (95% CI, 1.1-2.1; p = 0.009) increase in incidence rate ratio (IRR) for SDI, similar to radiologists (1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.5; p = 0.001). In a separate model, every 1.0 unit decrease in the BHI Z-score by BoneXpert was associated with a 2.9-fold (95% CI, 2.0-4.2; p < 0.001) increase in IRR for SDI.
conclusionBoneXpert provided BA results that were similar to those generated by radiologists in individuals with DMD and that retained the clinically relevant association between BA delay and VF. We also demonstrated that lower BHI Z-scores in individuals with DMD were associated with spinal fragility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41120763What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.