Trial reportScientific reports2025
Investigation of the effectiveness of cooling spray on mammography comfort.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the most common cancer types in recent years. Early diagnosis of breast cancer increases the success of treatment. Breast cancer screening is thus highly critical. Mammography is a screening tool that is still globally valid. I would propose that Mammography can potentially be painful. In our study, we aimed to determine the level of pain experienced by using coolant spray before mammography imaging. Our study is a randomized double-blind prospective study. It was conducted on patients who agreed to participate in the study. In our study, coolant spray was applied to the case group and normal saline solution to the control group. After the procedure, data on experienced pain (using the VAS scale), comfort level, and the possibility of having a mammogram again were collected. The data obtained were analyzed in SPSS program. The number of patients admitted to the mammography unit during our study was 162. After applying the exclusion criteria, the study was completed with 136 patients. There was no statistical relationship between the placebo and coolant spray groups in terms of age, marital status, city/ provincial center-rural area of residence, educational status, employment status, smoking and menopausal status. The average VAS value experienced was lower in the coolant spray group than in the placebo group(4.82-6.84). The Coolant spray group had more positive responses to the question 'I would have mammography screening again'. Both findings were statistically significant(p < 0.05). A significant amount of pain is felt during the mammography procedure and this causes serious discomfort. Although different studies have been conducted to reduce this pain level, this is the first study in the literature to investigate the reduction of pain during mammography imaging using coolant spray. The pain perceived in the coolant spray group was considerably lower than in the placebo group. The rate of subsequent visits for mammography was similarly higher in the coolant spray group. A national screening program needs to involve the majority of the population in order to be feasible. For more screening to take place, appropriate environment and conditions should be provided. The most important reservation of the patients is the feeling of pain. Pain, which is one of the most important obstacles to mammography, can be reduced by using coolant spray.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.