ArticleScientific reports2025
Image memorability depends on interference in memory.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Some experiences are better remembered than others by most people. This inherent characteristic of an event to be remembered or forgotten is known as memorability. However, it is unclear what drives certain experiences to be more memorable than others, and whether all aspects of an experience are better remembered. Interference across experiences is a major barrier that our memory system must overcome, yet we do not know how interference may impact the memorability of our experiences. Exploring this facet of memory may allow us to parse what drives certain experiences to be memorable or forgettable. To this end, we developed a memory task that varied image memorability and image interference during a memory test and measured target recognition - memory for repeated images, and lure discrimination - discernment of similar "lure" images, increasing interference in memory. While effects of memorability were evident for target recognition, the impact of memorability on lure discrimination depended on interference, where images with higher levels of interference did not benefit from memorability compared to lower levels of interference. Furthermore, these effects were time-dependent: memorability impacted memory immediately, but not after a longer time delay. These findings suggest that the concept of memorability depends on how and when memory is measured.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.