Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41120699›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Image memorability depends on interference in memory.

Fernanda Morales-Calva, Aditi Velgekar, Michelle Sekili, Stephanie L Leal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fernanda Morales-CalvaDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Rice University, 6500 Main St., 77030, Houston, TX, USA.
Aditi VelgekarDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Rice University, 6500 Main St., 77030, Houston, TX, USA.
Michelle SekiliDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Rice University, 6500 Main St., 77030, Houston, TX, USA.
Stephanie L LealDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Rice University, 6500 Main St., 77030, Houston, TX, USA. stephanieleal@ucla.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some experiences are better remembered than others by most people. This inherent characteristic of an event to be remembered or forgotten is known as memorability. However, it is unclear what drives certain experiences to be more memorable than others, and whether all aspects of an experience are better remembered. Interference across experiences is a major barrier that our memory system must overcome, yet we do not know how interference may impact the memorability of our experiences. Exploring this facet of memory may allow us to parse what drives certain experiences to be memorable or forgettable. To this end, we developed a memory task that varied image memorability and image interference during a memory test and measured target recognition - memory for repeated images, and lure discrimination - discernment of similar "lure" images, increasing interference in memory. While effects of memorability were evident for target recognition, the impact of memorability on lure discrimination depended on interference, where images with higher levels of interference did not benefit from memorability compared to lower levels of interference. Furthermore, these effects were time-dependent: memorability impacted memory immediately, but not after a longer time delay. These findings suggest that the concept of memorability depends on how and when memory is measured.

Indexed as

MemoryMental RecallRecognition, PsychologyAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41120699
PMCPMC12540706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.