ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Surgical video-based temporal action analysis algorithm and competency assessment in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: development and exploratory evaluation.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a fundamental procedure in surgical training. Conventional surgical competency assessment relies heavily on outcome-oriented metrics; however, process-oriented metrics, such as temporal patterns of surgical actions, may better capture operative efficiency and technical proficiency. Nevertheless, existing expert-based evaluation tools remain resource-intensive and susceptible to observer bias.
methodsWe used the publicly available Cholec80 dataset. Surgical action segments were sampled from dissection and completion stages during Calot's triangle dissection phase using a fixed-length sliding window. A lag-aligned distance method enabled stage-specific comparison of segments across videos. Representative segments from the high-performance group were used to compute cumulative temporal dissimilarity scores for test videos. These scores were first correlated with ground-truth competency scores to assess overall algorithm performance. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis identified predictive features from both surgical outcome- and process-oriented metrics, which were subsequently selected to train a support vector regression (SVR) model. Finally, the model's performance in predicting competency scores was evaluated.
resultsEighty LC videos (median competency score: 26; IQR 23.9-28.0) were used for algorithm and model evaluations, with six high-performance videos (scores ≥ 31) selected to establish representative segments. Cumulative temporal dissimilarity scores showed a significant negative correlation with ground-truth scores (r = - 0.61; P < .001). Critical-view-of-safety score, operative time, and cumulative temporal dissimilarity score were identified as the top three predictors for SVR modeling. The model demonstrated strong predictive performance, with predicted scores highly correlated with ground-truth scores (r = 0.86; P < .001).
conclusionThis study introduces a novel process-oriented algorithm for video-based temporal action analysis using a lag-aligned distance method. Furthermore, by integrating outcome- and process-oriented metrics, the proposed model enables accurate and quantitative prediction of surgical competency scores. This approach advances beyond conventional tools, offering a scalable and interpretable solution for automated, objective evaluation of surgical performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41120664What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.