Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41120651›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2026

Service User Experiences and Perspectives of Social Prescribing Services for Mental Health.

Matthew Cooper, Darren Flynn, Jason Scott, Kirsten Ashley, Leah Avery

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew CooperNewcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom. matthew.cooper2@ncl.ac.uk.
Darren FlynnDepartment of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Jason ScottDepartment of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Kirsten AshleySchool of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
Leah AverySchool of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To explore service user experiences and perspectives of social prescribing for mental health and to develop theoretically informed strategies to optimise their experience. This qualitative study utilises semi-structured interviews with participants recruited via gatekeepers across social prescribing services in England and Wales. A topic guide, informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the COM-B model of behaviour change, was used to structure interviews. Data were analysed using Thematic Framework Analysis guided by the TDF. A total of eighteen service users participated in this research. Ten were aware of social prescribing and could provide an accurate explanation of what it is; three recognised the term but could not explain the concept; and five had no prior knowledge, despite accessing social prescribing services. Overall, awareness of social prescribing, its benefits for mental health, and service accessibility were limited and identified as key areas for improvement. Eleven theoretical domains identified related to engagement with social prescribing services for mental health. Twenty-one analytical themes were generated across the eleven domains. Of these themes, seven suggested changes to the current provision, with the remaining fourteen providing recommendations for future services. Findings advance the field of social prescribing for mental health by providing insight into the experiences and perceptions of service users, underpinned by a robust behavioural framework analysis to identify behavioural determinants.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental Health ServicesAdultAgedEnglandFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSocial PrescribingWales

Identifiers

PMID41120651
PMCPMC12963173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.