ArticleScientific reports2025
Clinical application of 3D reconstruction and accurate volume measurement of white matter in patients with cognitive dysfunction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To quantitatively measure the volume of white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) in different parts of the brain in patients with different types of cognitive function and analyze the relationship between WMH volume and cognitive function to obtain a threshold WMH volume for the early detection and clinical assessment of cognitive dysfunction. The clinical data and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of patients with WMHs indicated by cranial MR in the Department of General Medicine of Shandong Provincial Third Hospital were collected. The FLAIR sequence images of the patients were subsequently analyzed with computer automated detection technology. Through deep learning-based 3D reconstruction, the specific volumes of the patients' WMHs were obtained. Patients were divided into three groups according to the Fazekas scale score: Fazekas score 1, Fazekas score 2, and Fazekas score 3. The WMH volumes within each group were subsequently compared, and the correlations between the WMH volumes of the patients in each group and their Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores, Trail Making Test A (TMT-A) scores, Trail Making Test B (TMT-B) scores, age, duration of hypertension, duration of diabetes, basic information, etc., were analyzed. The patients were subsequently divided into a normal group (MoCA > 25) and a mild cognitive impairment group (18 < MoCA ≤ 25) on the basis of their MoCA scores. The WMH volumes in each group were then calculated separately. The cutoff values of the WMH volume for differentiating between the normal group and mild cognitive impairment group were obtained through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The MoCA scores significantly differed among the three Fazekas score groups (r = - 0.5716, P < 0.0001). There were also statistically significant differences in the total volume of WMHs among the three groups (r = 0.7527, P < 0.0001). WMH volume was positively correlated with the TMT-A and TMT-B scores (r = 0.2345, P< 0.05; r = 0.2404, P < 0.05) but negatively correlated with the MoCA score (r = - 0.4789, P < 0.0001). Moreover, WMH volume was positively associated with the duration of hypertension (F = 4.743, P < 0.05) but not with the duration of diabetes (F = 1.431, P = 0.2456). The cutoff value of WMH volume between the normal group and mild cognitive impairment group was 15.474900; at this value, the sensitivity of the WMH volume in discriminating the two groups was 0.808, and the specificity was 0.556. Automated detection technology can successfully be used to obtain the volume of WMHs in different parts of patients' brains. Since WMH volume is correlated with cognitive function scores, we can use MRI to identify and assess individuals who show potential early signs of cognitive dysfunction and administer early interventions. These findings provide potential preventive and therapeutic targets for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of cognitive dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.