ArticleScientific reports2025
Real-world safety assessment of tamsulosin based on adverse event analysis from the FAERS database.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioequivalence, Food-Effect Assessment and Exploratory IVIVC of Two Extended-Release Tamsulosin 0.4 mg Formulations in Healthy Mexican Subjects.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Drug- and patient-specific neurological risk profiles of α1-adrenergic blockers: evidence from FAERS and external validation in JADER.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tamsulosin, an alpha-1-adrenergic receptor antagonist, is a commonly used drug in urology. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of tamsulosin during its use by examining the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. This study was a retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis using FAERS data from the first quarter of 2004 to the second quarter of 2024. Four disproportionate analyses were used to detect safety signals. Bonferroni correction was applied to control for type I error due to multiple testing at the Preferred Term (PT) level. Further evoked time-series analysis and subgroup analysis were performed to assess the stability of the results of the associated adverse events (AEs). A total of 10,071 reports listing tamsulosin as the primary suspected drug were identified. The time-to-onset analysis revealed a polarized distribution, with a concentration of AEs occurring during the early phase of treatment. Subgroup analysis demonstrated gender-specific differences in AEs reporting patterns, particularly between men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and women with ureteral stones. Age-related differences were also noted, with increased reporting of certain AEs in middle-aged and elderly populations. In addition to well-known AEs, several unexpected and rarely reported signals were detected. Most findings were expected, but new signals of previously unreported hyperhidrosis, cystitis, panic reaction, and painful erection were reported. These signals should be interpreted cautiously and require further validation in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.