ArticleScientific reports2025
Decoding the mind of self-compassion through a topic modeling analysis of 9000+ free-text narratives.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Self-compassion, defined as compassion directed toward oneself in difficult situations, has been widely studied; however, the specific cognitive and behavioral patterns associated with it remain poorly understood. Participants (780 Japanese individuals; mean age = 43.0, SD = 10.6, range = 19-75) responded to 12 free-text prompts asking them to describe their typical thoughts and behaviors in three difficult situations (suffering, recognizing personal shortcomings, and experiencing failure). Employing structural topic modeling (one of the natural language processing techniques), we used participants' scores on the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS) and the Compassionate Engagement and Action Scales (CEAS) as metadata to quantify the associations between self-compassion and each topic. The results revealed that higher self-compassion was linked to topics reflecting problem-solving orientation, balanced optimism, and flexible responses. Conversely, lower self-compassion was associated with self-criticism, upward social comparison, envy, and depressive inaction. These patterns varied by context: for example, among individuals with high self-compassion, balanced optimism predominated in contexts of suffering and failure, while flexible responses emerged when participants recognized personal shortcomings. Furthermore, the unique variance of the positive SCS items was associated with adaptive cognitive processes such as balanced optimism and flexible responses, whereas the unique variance of the CEAS was associated with problem-solving-oriented behavioral processes. This study advances the literature by offering context-sensitive, nuanced insights into self-compassion and demonstrates that a data-driven approach on large-scale free-text data can uncover nuanced processes that conventional rating scales may not capture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.