ArticleScientific reports2025
Impact of removal frequency on site-specific force profile and dimensional stability of clear aligners in relation to dental crowding.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Automated micro-CT quantification of clear aligner fit: a pilot comparison of manufacturing processes.BMC oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This in vitro comparative study examined the effects of high removal frequency on force generation and gap width changes in direct-printed aligners (DPAs) compared with thermoformed aligners (TFAs), considering different tooth positions and crowding conditions. A total of 104 aligners, comprising 26 pairs of DPAs and 26 pairs of TFAs, were fabricated for both crowded and noncrowded maxillary arch models. Force measurements were conducted at initial placement and after every 20 removal cycles for up to 100 cycles, whereas gap width analyses were performed at initial placement and after 100 removal cycles. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the force and gap width changes, with a focus on site-specific differences. DPAs demonstrated significantly lower initial forces and maintained consistent force levels over increased removal frequencies, irrespective of crowding conditions. Conversely, TFAs exhibited higher initial forces, with significant force decay over time, particularly in crowded models. DPAs also showed improved fit over time with decreased gap widths, whereas the gap widths of TFAs increased, particularly in the gingival areas. DPAs offer superior dimensional stability and force predictability over TFAs while maintaining consistent performance across different tooth positions and crowding scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.