ArticleScientific reports2025
Identification of a novel bacteriophage attachment site into ffs, the 4.5S non-coding RNA component of the signal recognition particle.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bioinformatic analysis of Enterococcus faecalis temperate phage ϕEf11 identified prospective attP and attB core attachment (att) sites consisting of identical 27 nt sequences (ACTAAGCAAGTGCCGCCATGTGTCTGA). The presumptive attPcore site was located 74 nts from the terminus of the ϕEf11 integrase (ORF 31) while the presumptive attB site was located within ffs, encoding the 4.5S RNA component of the signal recognition particle (SRP). After examining 6,028 genomes of 61 Enterococcal species using updated Phage_Finder software, attL and attR sequences disrupting ffs could only be detected in lysogenic strains of E. faecalis. We have found no other example of a prophage inserted into ffs, therefore, the ffs locus for ϕEf11 integration represents a novel phage attachment site. SRP functions in the transport of proteins through the cellular membrane to the periplasmic space. Integration into ffs resulted in alteration of the 3' end of the 4.5 S RNA, where in E. coli, alterations in the same region cause defects in membrane protein insertion. Lysogens of ϕEf11 are resistant to the ϕEf11 endolysin. Since endolysin activity is dependent upon binding to cell surface receptors, it is conceivable that defective SRP function results in alteration of the endolysin receptor, preventing endolysin function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.