ArticleScientific reports2025
Impact of habitat associations on saproxylic beetle assemblages and their damage severity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Saproxylic beetles, as primary decomposers in forest ecosystems, play a crucial role in the decomposition of dead wood. However, there is a significant gap in understanding the extent of assemblages and damage caused by these insects, which is essential for managing the quality and utilization of dead wood resources in natural forests. This study employed the Bevan damage classification system to quantify the severity of saproxylic beetle damage to fallen trees, focusing on the boreal forest in the Green zone of Ulaanbaatar, the capital of Mongolia. A factorial design was used to assess the influence of forest landscape (north vs. south mixed forest), tree species (Siberian spruce Picea obovata and Siberian pine Pinus sibirica), and decay class (1-4) on beetle damage indices, abundance and feeding guilds (cambium consumers, wood borers, predators, parasitoids, and detritivores). Our findings reveal that decay class significantly affects beetle abundance and damage severity with early stages showing the highest values. Cambium consumers and wood borers were more abundant in decay class 1 (DC1) for downed spruce, with Ips typographus (24.7%) and Tetropium castaneum (15%) causing the most damage. For the Siberian pine, Monochamus galloprovincialis (9.8%) and Judolia sexmaculata (13.3%) were the most damaging in DC1 followed by Pityogenes conjunctus (10%). The results suggest that Siberian spruce may be more susceptible to saproxylic beetle damage than the Siberian pine, with structural features such as bark cover branch size and wood moisture playing a critical role, especially in early decay stages. Based on our findings, we recommend decay-stage-specific management approaches, particularly targeting early decay stages (DC1-DC2) where beetle damage is most severe. Practical strategies include early detection of freshly downed trees, bark removal to reduce suitable habitat for cambium consumers, and on-site processing techniques such as bark gouging or mechanical debarking. These methods allow deadwood biomass to be retained in the forest while reducing pest pressure, offering a viable alternative to salvage logging. Such approaches are especially relevant in protected areas, where they can support both pest control and biodiversity conservation objectives. However, given the geographic scope limited to boreal forests of Ulaanbaatar, caution should be exercised in extrapolating these recommendations to other regions without further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.