Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41120535›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Impact of habitat associations on saproxylic beetle assemblages and their damage severity.

Bat-Amgalan Batchudur, Nanzaddorj Tsagaantsooj, Dashzeveg Ganbat, Bazartseren Boldgiv

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bat-Amgalan BatchudurMongolian Academy of Sciences, Division of Forest Resource and Forest Protection, Institute of Geoecology and Geography, Ulaanbaatar, 15170, Mongolia. batchudurb@mas.ac.mn.
Nanzaddorj TsagaantsoojMongolian Academy of Sciences, Division of Forest Resource and Forest Protection, Institute of Geoecology and Geography, Ulaanbaatar, 15170, Mongolia.
Dashzeveg GanbatMongolian Academy of Sciences, Division of Forest Resource and Forest Protection, Institute of Geoecology and Geography, Ulaanbaatar, 15170, Mongolia.
Bazartseren BoldgivDepartment of Biology, National University of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, 210646, Mongolia. boldgiv@num.edu.mn.

Funding

Taylor Family-Asia Foundation Endowed Chair in Ecology and Conservation Biology TAF31914.100.004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saproxylic beetles, as primary decomposers in forest ecosystems, play a crucial role in the decomposition of dead wood. However, there is a significant gap in understanding the extent of assemblages and damage caused by these insects, which is essential for managing the quality and utilization of dead wood resources in natural forests. This study employed the Bevan damage classification system to quantify the severity of saproxylic beetle damage to fallen trees, focusing on the boreal forest in the Green zone of Ulaanbaatar, the capital of Mongolia. A factorial design was used to assess the influence of forest landscape (north vs. south mixed forest), tree species (Siberian spruce Picea obovata and Siberian pine Pinus sibirica), and decay class (1-4) on beetle damage indices, abundance and feeding guilds (cambium consumers, wood borers, predators, parasitoids, and detritivores). Our findings reveal that decay class significantly affects beetle abundance and damage severity with early stages showing the highest values. Cambium consumers and wood borers were more abundant in decay class 1 (DC1) for downed spruce, with Ips typographus (24.7%) and Tetropium castaneum (15%) causing the most damage. For the Siberian pine, Monochamus galloprovincialis (9.8%) and Judolia sexmaculata (13.3%) were the most damaging in DC1 followed by Pityogenes conjunctus (10%). The results suggest that Siberian spruce may be more susceptible to saproxylic beetle damage than the Siberian pine, with structural features such as bark cover branch size and wood moisture playing a critical role, especially in early decay stages. Based on our findings, we recommend decay-stage-specific management approaches, particularly targeting early decay stages (DC1-DC2) where beetle damage is most severe. Practical strategies include early detection of freshly downed trees, bark removal to reduce suitable habitat for cambium consumers, and on-site processing techniques such as bark gouging or mechanical debarking. These methods allow deadwood biomass to be retained in the forest while reducing pest pressure, offering a viable alternative to salvage logging. Such approaches are especially relevant in protected areas, where they can support both pest control and biodiversity conservation objectives. However, given the geographic scope limited to boreal forests of Ulaanbaatar, caution should be exercised in extrapolating these recommendations to other regions without further study.

Indexed as

ColeopteraEcosystemAnimalsForestsMongoliaPiceaPinusTreesWoodDamage indexDecay classDowned tree speciesFeeding guildsGreen zone of Ulaanbaatar citySaproxylic beetle

Identifiers

PMID41120535
PMCPMC12540800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.