ArticleScientific reports2025
Assessment of potentially toxic elements in agricultural and urban soils of lesser Poland using ICP-MS and uncertainty estimation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluates the status of soil contamination by potentially toxic elements (PTEs)-Cr, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Mo, Cd, Sn, Ba, Pb in agricultural and urban areas in the Lesser Poland Voivodeship in light of applicable regulations. The method validation was performed, and the uncertainty of the analytical process, including the sampling stage, was estimated. Soil samples collected by the doubling method were acid-mineralized and then analyzed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Validation was performed with reference materials, and process uncertainty was determined by analysis of variance in the ROBAN programme. PCA analysis was also used to determine correlations between PTEs. The results for Zn, Sn, and Cu in agricultural soils, as well as Cu in urban soils, were below the limit of quantification. For Mo, Cd, and Pb in agricultural soil, and Zn and As in urban soil, the estimation was rejected due to inconclusive results. In agricultural and urban soil samples, the average Ba content was respectively 209.27% and 114.72% of the limit value standard, indicating high Ba levels. In urban soil, the Cd concentration reached 292% of the limit value. The method validation was successful, confirming the accuracy of the analysis. Exceeding the maximum limit value for Ba and Cd in soil samples can have a negative impact on the environment and pose a threat to soil and human health. More research is required to monitor the environmental risk and identify sources of hazardous metal emissions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.