ArticleScientific reports2025
An automated framework for traffic noise level analysis using explainable artificial intelligence techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traffic noise is a significant source of noise pollution, disrupting urban environments with fluctuating sound. The existing research on traffic noise prediction predominantly focuses on statistical methods to identify significant predictors affecting noise levels. While these approaches offer valuable insights, they often lack the interpretability and adaptability needed for complex urban environments. The proposed framework is aimed at presenting the insights of explainable AI (XAI) for the regression analysis of traffic noise levels which is predicted with the help of advanced machine learning (ML) models such as K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) and Random Forest (RF). Statistical analysis of these models was tested with a performance matrix by utilizing a comprehensive traffic dataset of Dhanbad city that includes vehicle speed and categories of vehicle type. Notably, the RF model excelled over other models with an RMSE of 1.27 and [Formula: see text] of 0.94. The XAI model was developed with the base of RF regressor which records the highest [Formula: see text] score. The analysis revealed that the number of 2-wheeler vehicle categories is a key predictor of traffic noise levels. The finding of this study can act as an automated information system for the benefit of the urban planners and decision-making bodies to mitigate noise pollution effectively in mid-sized cities. It is worth mentioning that the primary purpose of employing multiple ML models (RF, XGBoost, KNN, LSTM) in this study is to conduct a comparative analysis and identify the most suitable algorithm for urban traffic noise prediction in a Tier-2 Indian city.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.