ArticleScientific reports2025
The prevalence, recognition, and treatment of depression and anxiety symptoms among Chinese cardiovascular outpatients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03225586 (Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology Study
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) have been the leading cause of death in China. Depression and anxiety are recognized as significant risk factors for poor prognosis and disability among Chinese CVD patients. However, these mental health conditions have received limited clinical attention in the context of CVD management. To date, comprehensive national epidemiological data on the prevalence of depression and anxiety in cardiovascular clinics (CVCs) in China are lacking. The present study aims to describe the prevalence, recognition and therapeutic inequity in CVCs so as to improve the overall health outcomes of CVD patients. A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted across secondary and tertiary hospitals in China (January 2021 to December 2022), enrolling 1049 CVD patients from CVCs consecutively. Depression and anxiety symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), respectively. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected via standardized questionnaires. Risk factors were analyzed by multivariable logistic regression, meanwhile recognition rates and treatment inequities were systematically evaluated. The pooled prevalence of depression and anxiety were 61.4% and 53.4% respectively, with 23.9% exhibiting moderate-to-severe symptoms. The multivariable logistic regression analyses disclosed that residing in South Central China, usual activities impairment, as well as experiencing pain or discomfort in daily life were associated with the presence of both depression and anxiety among patients in CVCs. Alarmingly, only 41.5% of depressed patients and 44.1% of anxious patients were recognized; and fewer than 50% accessed guideline-recommended interventions (psycho-education or medications). Patients residing in South Central China, having moderate or severe mental symptoms and having anxiety and depression comorbidity were more likely to be recognized and treated by cardiologists. This first national study to demonstrate the "high burden-low care" paradox in Chinese CVCs highlights systemic gaps in mental health integration. Urgent implementation of collaborative care models is warranted, prioritizing standardized screening protocols and equity-focused interventions for vulnerable subgroups. These findings provide pivotal evidence for advancing Chinese CVD clinical guidelines to address the mental health crisis in cardiology.Trial registration: The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT03225586 (Registration Date: 2017-07-19).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.