ArticleScientific reports2025
Identification of a novel m6A RNA methylation regulator-based signature for prognosis and immune landscape prediction in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in research on RNA methylation and its role in the immune microenvironment of gastrointestinal tumors.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Integrative single-cell, spatial, and bulk transcriptomics reveal an FMR1-FTO axis linked to the immune-excluded phenotype in gastric cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Growing evidence has revealed that N6-Methyladenosine (m6A) modification is crucial in cancer development, yet its role in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. To address this, we developed a novel m6A regulator-based prognostic signature (m6A-RPS) using comprehensive bioinformatics analysis of TCGA, GEO, and ICGC datasets. Our analysis revealed widespread dysregulation of m6A regulators in HCC tissues. Unsupervised consensus clustering further revealed distinct m6A methylation subtypes with significant survival differences, indicating the potential of m6A modification patterns in prognostic stratification for HCC. Using TCGA-LIHC cohort, LASSO Cox regression selected five key hub regulators (VIRMA, YTHDF1, YTHDF2, YTHDC1, IGF2BP3) to construct the m6A-RPS model. This model proved to be a powerful and independent prognostic indicator (HR = 2.849 (1.819-4.461), P < 0.001), and validated in external cohort (ICGC-LIRI-JP). Patients with high m6A-RPS scores exhibited significantly poorer overall survival and progression-free interval, and the scores were positively correlated with adverse clinical characteristics (e.g., advanced stage, vascular invasion). To facilitate clinical translation, we developed a nomogram that integrated the m6A-RPS with key clinical variables for individualized survival prediction. Genomically, the high-risk group exhibited higher tumor mutation burden and mutation rates in hub regulators. Functional enrichment analyses implicated dysregulation in critical pathways like Wnt signaling, DNA replication, and cell cycle. Crucially, m6A-RPS stratified the tumor immune microenvironment: high-risk patients displayed an immunosuppressive phenotype characterized by enriched Th2 cells and higher potential for immune escape, whereas low-risk patients showed enhanced cytotoxic immune infiltration and elevated immunophenoscores, suggesting greater potential responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Differential sensitivity to chemotherapy agents was also predicted. Finally, we constructed a regulatory network linking miRNAs, hub regulators, and 2 downstream target genes. Our study establishes m6A-RPS as a robust tool for prognosis prediction and immune landscape assessment in HCC, offering significant potential to guide personalized therapeutic strategies, particularly immunotherapy selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.