ArticleScientific reports2025
An interpretable machine learning approach based on SHAP, Sobol and LIME values for precise estimation of daily soybean crop coefficients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Interpretable machine learning and mendelian randomization identify risk factors for lower extremity arterial embolism and thrombosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increasing water scarcity and climate variability have intensified the need for precise agricultural irrigation management. Accurate estimation of crop coefficients (Kc) is critical for determining crop water requirements, especially in arid and semi-arid regions. However, conventional methods for estimating Kc often rely on generalized plant characteristics, which may not account for local climatic variations. In this study, we address this challenge by predicting the daily crop coefficient for soybean using four machine learning models: Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Extra Tree (ET), Random Forest (RF), and CatBoost. These models were trained on meteorological data from Suhaj Governorate, Egypt, spanning 1979-2014. Additionally, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), Sobol sensitivity analysis, and Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) were applied to evaluate model interpretability and consistency with physical processes. Among the models evaluated, the ET model achieved the highest accuracy, with r = 0.96, NSE = 0.93, RMSE = 0.05, and MAE = 0.02. XGBoost and RF also performed well, each obtaining r = 0.96, NSE = 0.92, RMSE = 0.06, and MAE = 0.02. In comparison, CatBoost demonstrated slightly lower accuracy, with r = 0.95, NSE = 0.91, RMSE = 0.06, and MAE = 0.02. SHAP and Sobol analyses consistently identified the antecedent crop coefficient [[Formula: see text]] and solar radiation (Sin) as the most influential variables. LIME results revealed localized variations in predictions, reflecting dynamic crop-climate interactions. This study underscores the importance of integrating interpretable machine learning models to enhance both predictive accuracy and reliability while maintaining alignment with critical physical processes. The proposed framework offers a robust tool for improving daily Kc estimation, thereby supporting more sustainable irrigation practices and climate-resilient agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.