Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41120485›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Optimizing ancient DNA recovery from archaeological plant seeds.

Giada Bolognesi, Adriana Latorre, Martina Marini, Arianna Codato, Francesco Fontani, Fabio Saggioro, Donata Luiselli, Patrizia Basso, Elisabetta Cilli, Diana Bellin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Giada BolognesiDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Strada le Grazie, 15, Verona, 37134, Italy.
Adriana LatorreDepartment of Cultural Heritage, University of Bologna, Via degli Ariani, 1, Ravenna, 48121, Italy.
Martina MariniDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Strada le Grazie, 15, Verona, 37134, Italy.
Arianna CodatoDepartment of Cultural Heritage, University of Bologna, Via degli Ariani, 1, Ravenna, 48121, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7242-0659
Francesco FontaniDepartment of Cultural Heritage, University of Bologna, Via degli Ariani, 1, Ravenna, 48121, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3849-2170
Fabio SaggioroDepartment of Culture and Civilisation, University of Verona, Viale dell'Università, 4, Verona, 37129, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2105-2478
Donata LuiselliDepartment of Cultural Heritage, University of Bologna, Via degli Ariani, 1, Ravenna, 48121, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4888-0233
Patrizia BassoDepartment of Culture and Civilisation, University of Verona, Viale dell'Università, 4, Verona, 37129, Italy.
Elisabetta CilliDepartment of Cultural Heritage, University of Bologna, Via degli Ariani, 1, Ravenna, 48121, Italy. elisabetta.cilli@unibo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0407-267X
Diana BellinDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Strada le Grazie, 15, Verona, 37134, Italy. diana.bellin@univr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0308-7733

Funding

Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Verona Vicenza Belluno e Ancona Bando Ricerca e Sviluppo 2022MUR PRIN 2022 20228C8EFW, PNRR, M4.C2.1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paleogenomics has recently expanded its applications, including studies on plant remains to trace evolution and domestication. However, recovering ancient DNA (aDNA) from archaeobotanical remains is challenging due to the highly fragmented nature of endogenous aDNA, low copy numbers and inhibitors that hinder further manipulation and analysis. In this study, we explored the application of a reagent optimized against soil inhibitors, typically used in sediment DNA extraction, coupled with an aDNA-specific silica binding step, to improve and maximize the recovery of processable aDNA. Ancient grape pips were used as starting material. The approach was evaluated in two archaeological contexts, assessing the suitability of extracts for downstream processing, including NGS library production and sequencing. In conclusion, we demonstrated the protocol was effective in recovering aDNA, achieving higher yields and more consistent performance across sites compared to previous extraction methods. It significantly improved the library production step, particularly in challenging sites. Finally, we have shown it successfully allowed to incorporate into sequencing libraries the highly fragmented and damaged endogenous aDNA from ancient samples, while preserving read yield, library complexity and other sequencing metrics. Future studies on historical and ancient plant remains will benefit from these advancements in high-quality aDNA recovery.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyDNA, AncientDNA, PlantSeedsGene LibraryHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSequence Analysis, DNADNA, AncientDNA, PlantAncient DNA extractionGrape seedsHumic acidsNGS sequencingSingle-strand DNA library

Identifiers

PMID41120485
PMCPMC12540996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.